mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Information-Guided Identification of Training Data Imprint in (Proprietary) Large Language Models

arXiv 2503.12072 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2025cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High-quality training data has proven crucial for developing performant large language models (LLMs). However, commercial LLM providers disclose few, if any, details about the data used for training. This lack of transparency creates multiple challenges: it limits external oversight and inspection of LLMs for issues such as copyright infringement, it undermines the agency of data authors, and it hinders scientific research on critical issues such as data contamination and data selection. How can we recover what training data is known to LLMs? In this work, we demonstrate a new method to identify training data known to proprietary LLMs like GPT-4 without requiring any access to model weights or token probabilities, by using information-guided probes. Our work builds on a key observation: text passages with high surprisal are good search material for memorization probes. By evaluating a model's ability to successfully reconstruct high-surprisal tokens in text, we can identify a surprising number of texts memorized by LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2025.

Builds on

27 of 47 references.

References · 27

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  2. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  3. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  4. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  5. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  6. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  7. 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 258
  8. 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 230
  9. 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 229
  10. 2022Quantifying Privacy Risks of Masked Language Models Using Membership Inference Attackscited by 175
  11. 2024Infini-gram: Scaling Unbounded n-gram Language Models to a Trillion Tokenscited by 153
  12. 2024Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 147
15 more
  1. 2023What's In My Big Data?cited by 129
  2. 2023Speak, Memory: An Archaeology of Books Known to ChatGPT/GPT-4cited by 125
  3. 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 113
  4. 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?cited by 110
  5. 2023LLM360: Towards Fully Transparent Open-Source LLMscited by 104
  6. 2022Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacycited by 100
  7. 2023On Provable Copyright Protection for Generative Modelscited by 98
  8. 2024Investigating Data Contamination for Pre-training Language Modelscited by 91
  9. 2024DE-COP: Detecting Copyrighted Content in Language Models Training Datacited by 74
  10. 2023SILO Language Models: Isolating Legal Risk In a Nonparametric Datastorecited by 71
  11. 2023"According to ...": Prompting Language Models Improves Quoting from Pre-Training Datacited by 42
  12. 2023Information Value: Measuring Utterance Predictability as Distance from Plausible Alternativescited by 23
  13. 2024Data Contamination Report from the 2024 CONDA Shared Taskcited by 20
  14. 2024Sonnet or Not, Bot? Poetry Evaluation for Large Models and Datasetscited by 18
  15. 2024Automatic Generation of Model and Data Cards: A Step Towards Responsible AIcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.