Information-Guided Identification of Training Data Imprint in (Proprietary) Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-quality training data has proven crucial for developing performant large language models (LLMs). However, commercial LLM providers disclose few, if any, details about the data used for training. This lack of transparency creates multiple challenges: it limits external oversight and inspection of LLMs for issues such as copyright infringement, it undermines the agency of data authors, and it hinders scientific research on critical issues such as data contamination and data selection. How can we recover what training data is known to LLMs? In this work, we demonstrate a new method to identify training data known to proprietary LLMs like GPT-4 without requiring any access to model weights or token probabilities, by using information-guided probes. Our work builds on a key observation: text passages with high surprisal are good search material for memorization probes. By evaluating a model's ability to successfully reconstruct high-surprisal tokens in text, we can identify a surprising number of texts memorized by LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2025.
Builds on
27 of 47 references.
References · 27
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
- 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 258
- 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 230
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 229
- 2022Quantifying Privacy Risks of Masked Language Models Using Membership Inference Attackscited by 175
- 2024Infini-gram: Scaling Unbounded n-gram Language Models to a Trillion Tokenscited by 153
- 2024Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 147
15 more
- 2023What's In My Big Data?cited by 129
- 2023Speak, Memory: An Archaeology of Books Known to ChatGPT/GPT-4cited by 125
- 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 113
- 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?cited by 110
- 2023LLM360: Towards Fully Transparent Open-Source LLMscited by 104
- 2022Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacycited by 100
- 2023On Provable Copyright Protection for Generative Modelscited by 98
- 2024Investigating Data Contamination for Pre-training Language Modelscited by 91
- 2024DE-COP: Detecting Copyrighted Content in Language Models Training Datacited by 74
- 2023SILO Language Models: Isolating Legal Risk In a Nonparametric Datastorecited by 71
- 2023"According to ...": Prompting Language Models Improves Quoting from Pre-Training Datacited by 42
- 2023Information Value: Measuring Utterance Predictability as Distance from Plausible Alternativescited by 23
- 2024Data Contamination Report from the 2024 CONDA Shared Taskcited by 20
- 2024Sonnet or Not, Bot? Poetry Evaluation for Large Models and Datasetscited by 18
- 2024Automatic Generation of Model and Data Cards: A Step Towards Responsible AIcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2026Which Reasoning Trajectories Teach Students to Reason Better? A Simple Metric of Informative Alignmentcited by 13
- 2026Computational Hermeneutics: Evaluating generative AI as a cultural technologycited by 8
- 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Membership Inference with Simple N-Gram Coveragecited by 7
- 2025Measuring LLM Novelty As The Frontier Of Original And High-Quality Outputcited by 6
- 2026Alignment Whack-a-Mole : Finetuning Activates Verbatim Recall of Copyrighted Books in Large Language Modelscited by 6
- 2025Toward Human-Centered AI-Assisted Terminology Workcited by 1
- 2025RECAP: Reproducing Copyrighted Data from LLMs Training with an Agentic Pipelinecited by 0
- 2026Introducing Human-Centeredness in AI-Assisted Lexicographycited by 0
- 2026Introducing Human-Centeredness in AI-Assisted Lexicography13 Jul 2026
- 2026Computational Hermeneutics: Evaluating generative AI as a cultural technology31 Mar 2026
- 2026Alignment Whack-a-Mole : Finetuning Activates Verbatim Recall of Copyrighted Books in Large Language Models21 Mar 2026
- 2026Which Reasoning Trajectories Teach Students to Reason Better? A Simple Metric of Informative Alignment20 Jan 2026
- 2025Toward Human-Centered AI-Assisted Terminology Work21 Dec 2025
- 2025RECAP: Reproducing Copyrighted Data from LLMs Training with an Agentic Pipeline29 Oct 2025
- 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Membership Inference with Simple N-Gram Coverage13 Aug 2025
- 2025Measuring LLM Novelty As The Frontier Of Original And High-Quality Output13 Apr 2025