Revisiting Training-Inference Trigger Intensity in Backdoor Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Backdoor attacks typically place a specific trigger on certain training data, such that the model makes prediction errors on inputs with that trigger during inference. Despite the core role of the trigger, existing studies have commonly believed a perfect match between training-inference triggers is optimal. In this paper, for the first time, we systematically explore the training-inference trigger relation, particularly focusing on their mismatch, based on a Training-Inference Trigger Intensity Manipulation (TITIM) workflow. TITIM specifically investigates the training-inference trigger intensity, such as the size or the opacity of a trigger, and reveals new insights into trigger generalization and overfitting. These new insights challenge the above common belief by demonstrating that the training-inference trigger mismatch can facilitate attacks in two practical scenarios, posing more significant security threats than previously thought. First, when the inference trigger is fixed, using training triggers with mixed intensities leads to stronger attacks than using any single intensity. For example, on CIFAR-10 with ResNet-18, mixing training triggers with 1.0 and 0.1 opacities improves the worst-case attack success rate (ASR) (over different testing opacities) of the best single-opacity attack from 10.61% to 92.77%. Second, intentionally using certain mismatched training-inference triggers can improve the attack stealthiness, i.e., better bypassing defenses. For example, compared to the training/inference intensity of 1.0/1.0, using 1.0/0.7 decreases the area under the curve (AUC) of the Scale-Up defense from 0.96 to 0.62, while maintaining a high attack ASR (99.65% vs. 91.62%). The above new insights are validated to be generalizable across different backdoor attacks, models, datasets, tasks, and (digital/physical) domains.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 74 of its 110 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2025.
Builds on
74 of 110 references.
References · 74
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
38 more
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,101
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,055
- 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 947
- 2018Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 580
- 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 484
- 2019STRIP: A Defence Against Trojan Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 459
- 2018Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Activation Clusteringcited by 456
- 2020Backdoor Learning: A Surveycited by 426
- 2019Hidden Trigger Backdoor Attackscited by 371
- 2020Invisible Backdoor Attack with Sample-Specific Triggerscited by 353
- 2020Reflection Backdoor: A Natural Backdoor Attack on Deep Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2021Neural Attention Distillation: Erasing Backdoor Triggers from Deep Neural Networkscited by 324
- 2019Label-Consistent Backdoor Attackscited by 296
- 2021Anti-Backdoor Learning: Training Clean Models on Poisoned Datacited by 263
- 2019A new Backdoor Attack in CNNs by training set corruption without label poisoningcited by 242
- 2021Adversarial Neuron Pruning Purifies Backdoored Deep Modelscited by 235
- 2020BadNL: Backdoor Attacks against NLP Models with Semantic-preserving Improvementscited by 211
- 2019Detecting AI Trojans Using Meta Neural Analysiscited by 199
- 2020Blind Backdoors in Deep Learning Modelscited by 182
- 2020Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks on Video Recognition Modelscited by 169
- 2021Adversarial Unlearning of Backdoors via Implicit Hypergradientcited by 166
- 2021Rethinking the Backdoor Attacks' Triggers: A Frequency Perspectivecited by 161
- 2017Neural Trojanscited by 153
- 2018SentiNet: Detecting Localized Universal Attacks Against Deep Learning Systemscited by 152
- 2018Backdoor Embedding in Convolutional Neural Network Models via Invisible Perturbationcited by 134
- 2021SPECTRE: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Using Robust Statisticscited by 130
- 2019Demon in the Variant: Statistical Analysis of DNNs for Robust Backdoor Contamination Detectioncited by 124
- 2020RAB: Provable Robustness Against Backdoor Attackscited by 118
- 2019TBT: Targeted Neural Network Attack with Bit Trojancited by 113
- 2021Backdoor Scanning for Deep Neural Networks through K-Arm Optimizationcited by 98
- 2019Robust Anomaly Detection and Backdoor Attack Detection Via Differential Privacycited by 95
- 2020Deep Feature Space Trojan Attack of Neural Networks by Controlled Detoxificationcited by 95
- 2022BppAttack: Stealthy and Efficient Trojan Attacks against Deep Neural Networks via Image Quantization and Contrastive Adversarial Learningcited by 86
- 2019Defending Neural Backdoors via Generative Distribution Modelingcited by 84
- 2021Backdoor Attack in the Physical Worldcited by 84
- 2020DeepSweep: An Evaluation Framework for Mitigating DNN Backdoor Attacks using Data Augmentationcited by 77
- 2021Black-box Detection of Backdoor Attacks with Limited Information and Datacited by 73
50 most cited of 74 All 74 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Lilith: Backdoor Generalization under Training-Inference Trigger Shift
- 2026When Stronger Triggers Backfire: A High-Dimensional Theory of Backdoor Attacks
- 2026Removing the Trigger, Not the Backdoor: Alternative Triggers and Latent Backdoors
- 2026Backdoor Unlearning Generalization: A Path Toward the Removal of Unknown Triggers in LLMs
- 2026Trapping Attacker in Dilemma: Examining Internal Correlations and External Influences of Trigger for Defending GNN Backdoors
- 2023Demystifying Poisoning Backdoor Attacks from a Statistical Perspective
- 2021Backdoor Learning Curves: Explaining Backdoor Poisoning Beyond Influence Functions
- 2023Rethinking the Trigger-injecting Position in Graph Backdoor Attack