mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Integration of Explainable AI Techniques with Large Language Models for Enhanced Interpretability for Sentiment Analysis

arXiv 2503.11948 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interpretability remains a key difficulty in sentiment analysis with Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly in high-stakes applications where it is crucial to comprehend the rationale behind forecasts. This research addressed this by introducing a technique that applies SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) by breaking down LLMs into components such as embedding layer,encoder,decoder and attention layer to provide a layer-by-layer knowledge of sentiment prediction. The approach offers a clearer overview of how model interpret and categorise sentiment by breaking down LLMs into these parts. The method is evaluated using the Stanford Sentiment Treebank (SST-2) dataset, which shows how different sentences affect different layers. The effectiveness of layer-wise SHAP analysis in clarifying sentiment-specific token attributions is demonstrated by experimental evaluations, which provide a notable enhancement over current whole-model explainability techniques. These results highlight how the suggested approach could improve the reliability and transparency of LLM-based sentiment analysis in crucial applications.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2025.

Builds on

12 of 27 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  6. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  7. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  8. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
  9. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
  10. 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
  11. 2019Utilizing BERT for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis via Constructing Auxiliary Sentencecited by 122
  12. 2014Sentiment Analysis: A Surveycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.