mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Trust Under Siege: Label Spoofing Attacks against Machine Learning for Android Malware Detection

arXiv 2503.11841 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2025cs.CR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning (ML) malware detectors rely heavily on crowd-sourced AntiVirus (AV) labels, with platforms like VirusTotal serving as trusted sources of malware annotations. But what if attackers could manipulate these labels to classify benign software as malicious? We introduce label spoofing attacks, a new threat that contaminates crowd-sourced datasets by embedding minimal and undetectable malicious patterns into benign samples. These patterns coerce AV engines into misclassifying legitimate files as harmful, enabling poisoning attacks against ML-based malware classifiers trained on those data. We demonstrate this scenario by developing AndroVenom, a methodology for polluting realistic data sources and launching subsequent poisoning attacks against ML malware detectors. Experiments show that not only are state-of-the-art feature extractors unable to filter such injections, but various ML models experience Denial-of-Service (DoS) with as little as 1% poisoned samples. Additionally, attackers can flip decisions for specific unaltered benign samples by modifying only 0.015% of the training data, threatening their reputation and market share, while evading anomaly detectors operating on the training data. We conclude by raising concerns about the trustworthiness of ML training processes based on AV annotations and argue that further investigation is needed to develop more reliable labeling strategies.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.

Builds on

19 of 59 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 414
  3. 2018EMBER: An Open Dataset for Training Static PE Malware Machine Learning Modelscited by 165
  4. 2020Deep Partition Aggregation: Provable Defense against General Poisoning Attackscited by 115
  5. 2020Graph Backdoorcited by 112
  6. 2020Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 94
  7. 2022Wild Patterns Reloaded: A Survey of Machine Learning Security against Training Data Poisoningcited by 94
  8. 2020Bullseye Polytope: A Scalable Clean-Label Poisoning Attack with Improved Transferabilitycited by 66
  9. 2022Improved Certified Defenses against Data Poisoning with (Deterministic) Finite Aggregationcited by 52
  10. 2021Poison Forensics: Traceback of Data Poisoning Attacks in Neural Networkscited by 40
  11. 2022Towards A Proactive ML Approach for Detecting Backdoor Poison Samplescited by 40
  12. 2017Automated Poisoning Attacks and Defenses in Malware Detection Systems: An Adversarial Machine Learning Approachcited by 19
7 more
  1. 2020AVClass2: Massive Malware Tag Extraction from AV Labelscited by 19
  2. 2023Run-Off Election: Improved Provable Defense against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 17
  3. 2022On Collective Robustness of Bagging Against Data Poisoningcited by 16
  4. 2022Jigsaw Puzzle: Selective Backdoor Attack to Subvert Malware Classifierscited by 14
  5. 2023Decoding the Secrets of Machine Learning in Malware Classification: A Deep Dive into Datasets, Feature Extraction, and Model Performancecited by 13
  6. 2022Unraveling the Connections between Privacy and Certified Robustness in Federated Learning Against Poisoning Attackscited by 12
  7. 2023Analysis of Label-Flip Poisoning Attack on Machine Learning Based Malware Detectorcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.