mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

In Shift and In Variance: Assessing the Robustness of HAR Deep Learning Models against Variability

arXiv 2503.11466 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2025cs.HC cs.LG eess.SPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors can revolutionize healthcare by enabling continual health monitoring, disease prediction, and routine recognition. Despite the high accuracy of Deep Learning (DL) HAR models, their robustness to real-world variabilities remains untested, as they have primarily been trained and tested on limited lab-confined data. In this study, we isolate subject, device, position, and orientation variability to determine their effect on DL HAR models and assess the robustness of these models in real-world conditions. We evaluated the DL HAR models using the HARVAR and REALDISP datasets, providing a comprehensive discussion on the impact of variability on data distribution shifts and changes in model performance. Our experiments measured shifts in data distribution using Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) and observed DL model performance drops due to variability. We concur that studied variabilities affect DL HAR models differently, and there is an inverse relationship between data distribution shifts and model performance. The compounding effect of variability was analyzed, and the implications of variabilities in real-world scenarios were highlighted. MMD proved an effective metric for calculating data distribution shifts and explained the drop in performance due to variabilities in HARVAR and REALDISP datasets. Combining our understanding of variability with evaluating its effects will facilitate the development of more robust DL HAR models and optimal training techniques. Allowing Future models to not only be assessed based on their maximum F1 score but also on their ability to generalize effectively

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.

Builds on

8 of 40 references.

References · 8

  1. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  2. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
  3. 2015Visualizing and Understanding Recurrent Networkscited by 160
  4. 2022Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 65
  5. 2021Deep Learning in Human Activity Recognition with Wearable Sensors: A Review on Advancescited by 54
  6. 2021Improving Deep Learning for HAR with shallow LSTMscited by 30
  7. 2020Attend And Discriminate: Beyond the State-of-the-Art for Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensorscited by 19
  8. 2016Deep Recurrent Neural Network for Mobile Human Activity Recognition with High Throughputcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.