mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FlowKac: An Efficient Neural Fokker-Planck solver using Temporal Normalizing Flows and the Feynman-Kac Formula

arXiv 2503.11427 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2025cs.LG math.DS stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Solving the Fokker-Planck equation for high-dimensional complex dynamical systems remains a pivotal yet challenging task due to the intractability of analytical solutions and the limitations of traditional numerical methods. In this work, we present FlowKac, a novel approach that reformulates the Fokker-Planck equation using the Feynman-Kac formula, allowing to query the solution at a given point via the expected values of stochastic paths. A key innovation of FlowKac lies in its adaptive stochastic sampling scheme which significantly reduces the computational complexity while maintaining high accuracy. This sampling technique, coupled with a time-indexed normalizing flow, designed for capturing time-evolving probability densities, enables robust sampling of collocation points, resulting in a flexible and mesh-free solver. This formulation mitigates the curse of dimensionality and enhances computational efficiency and accuracy, which is particularly crucial for applications that inherently require dimensions beyond the conventional three. We validate the robustness and scalability of our method through various experiments on a range of stochastic differential equations, demonstrating significant improvements over existing techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.

Builds on

24 of 53 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  3. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  4. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  5. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  6. 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 678
  7. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
  8. 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 594
  9. 2017Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learningcited by 556
  10. 2020Scalable Gradients for Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 271
  11. 2017Deep learning-based numerical methods for high-dimensional parabolic partial differential equations and backward stochastic differential equationscited by 191
  12. 2021Neural SDEs as Infinite-Dimensional GANscited by 161
12 more
  1. 2023Tackling the Curse of Dimensionality with Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 79
  2. 2020Algorithms for Solving High Dimensional PDEs: From Nonlinear Monte Carlo to Machine Learningcited by 77
  3. 2022Continuous PDE Dynamics Forecasting with Implicit Neural Representationscited by 73
  4. 2020An overview on deep learning-based approximation methods for partial differential equationscited by 65
  5. 2018Forward-Backward Stochastic Neural Networks: Deep Learning of High-dimensional Partial Differential Equationscited by 55
  6. 2019Deep splitting method for parabolic PDEscited by 53
  7. 2022Probability flow solution of the Fokker-Planck equationcited by 47
  8. 2018Solving the Kolmogorov PDE by means of deep learningcited by 41
  9. 2021Adaptive deep density approximation for Fokker-Planck equationscited by 28
  10. 2021Solving time dependent Fokker-Planck equations via temporal normalizing flowcited by 17
  11. 2019Temporal Normalizing Flowscited by 8
  12. 2018Unbiased deep solvers for linear parametric PDEscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.