mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploration of Hepatitis B Virus Infection Dynamics through Physics-Informed Deep Learning Approach

arXiv 2503.10708 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2025q-bio.QM cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate forecasting of viral disease outbreaks is crucial for guiding public health responses and preventing widespread loss of life. In recent years, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising framework that can capture the intricate dynamics of viral infection and reliably predict its future progression. However, despite notable advances, the application of PINNs in disease modeling remains limited. Standard PINNs are effective in simulating disease dynamics through forward modeling but often face challenges in estimating key biological parameters from sparse or noisy experimental data when applied in an inverse framework. To overcome these limitations, a recent extension known as Disease Informed Neural Networks (DINNs) has emerged, offering a more robust approach to parameter estimation tasks. In this work, we apply this DINNs technique on a recently proposed hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection dynamics model to predict infection transmission within the liver. This model consists of four compartments: uninfected and infected hepatocytes, rcDNA-containing capsids, and free viruses. Leveraging the power of DINNs, we study the impacts of (i) variations in parameter range, (ii) experimental noise in data, (iii) sample sizes, (iv) network architecture and (v) learning rate. We employ this methodology in experimental data collected from nine HBV-infected chimpanzees and observe that it reliably estimates the model parameters. DINNs can capture infection dynamics and predict their future progression even when data of some compartments of the system are missing. Additionally, it identifies the influential model parameters that determine whether the HBV infection is cleared or persists within the host.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.

Builds on

16 of 83 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
  3. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
  4. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
  5. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 385
  6. 2017Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 208
  7. 2020Finite Versus Infinite Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 157
  8. 2019A Survey of Optimization Methods from a Machine Learning Perspectivecited by 91
  9. 2016Deep Learning in Bioinformaticscited by 48
  10. 2021Inverse-Dirichlet Weighting Enables Reliable Training of Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 43
  11. 2023Physics-Informed Computer Vision: A Review and Perspectivescited by 28
  12. 2020A Comparison of Optimization Algorithms for Deep Learningcited by 23
4 more
  1. 2021Data-driven approaches for predicting spread of infectious diseases through DINNs: Disease Informed Neural Networkscited by 15
  2. 2023Approaching epidemiological dynamics of COVID-19 with physics-informed neural networkscited by 7
  3. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning using Cyclical Learning Ratescited by 6
  4. 2024Adapting Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Improve ODE Optimization in Mosquito Population Dynamicscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.