mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Subgroup Performance Analysis in Hidden Stratifications

arXiv 2503.10382 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2025cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) models may suffer from significant performance disparities between patient groups. Identifying such disparities by monitoring performance at a granular level is crucial for safely deploying ML to each patient. Traditional subgroup analysis based on metadata can expose performance disparities only if the available metadata (e.g., patient sex) sufficiently reflects the main reasons for performance variability, which is not common. Subgroup discovery techniques that identify cohesive subgroups based on learned feature representations appear as a potential solution: They could expose hidden stratifications and provide more granular subgroup performance reports. However, subgroup discovery is challenging to evaluate even as a standalone task, as ground truth stratification labels do not exist in real data. Subgroup discovery has thus neither been applied nor evaluated for the application of subgroup performance monitoring. Here, we apply subgroup discovery for performance monitoring in chest x-ray and skin lesion classification. We propose novel evaluation strategies and show that a simplified subgroup discovery method without access to classification labels or metadata can expose larger performance disparities than traditional metadata-based subgroup analysis. We provide the first compelling evidence that subgroup discovery can serve as an important tool for comprehensive performance validation and monitoring of trustworthy AI in medicine.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2025.

Builds on

14 of 21 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
  4. 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
  5. 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 156
  6. 2024CheXpert Plus: Augmenting a Large Chest X-ray Dataset with Text Radiology Reports, Patient Demographics and Additional Image Formatscited by 106
  7. 2021The Spotlight: A General Method for Discovering Systematic Errors in Deep Learning Modelscited by 63
  8. 2020Debiasing Skin Lesion Datasets and Models? Not So Fastcited by 43
  9. 2023FACTS: First Amplify Correlations and Then Slice to Discover Biascited by 26
  10. 2022Detecting Shortcuts in Medical Images -- A Case Study in Chest X-rayscited by 20
  11. 2023Right for the Wrong Reason: Can Interpretable ML Techniques Detect Spurious Correlations?cited by 16
  12. 2024BiasPruner: Debiased Continual Learning for Medical Image Classificationcited by 12
2 more
  1. 2024Confidence intervals uncovered: Are we ready for real-world medical imaging AI?cited by 12
  2. 2023Even Small Correlation and Diversity Shifts Pose Dataset-Bias Issuescited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.