mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Designing Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Discrete Choice with Network Effects

arXiv 2503.09786 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2025cs.LG econ.EM stat.APcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a novel model architecture that incorporates network effects into discrete choice problems, achieving higher predictive performance than standard discrete choice models while offering greater interpretability than general-purpose flexible model classes. Econometric discrete choice models aid in studying individual decision-making, where agents select the option with the highest reward from a discrete set of alternatives. Intuitively, the utility an individual derives from a particular choice depends on their personal preferences and characteristics, the attributes of the alternative, and the value their peers assign to that alternative or their previous choices. However, most applications ignore peer influence, and models that do consider peer or network effects often lack the flexibility and predictive performance of recently developed approaches to discrete choice, such as deep learning. We propose a novel graph convolutional neural network architecture to model network effects in discrete choices, achieving higher predictive performance than standard discrete choice models while retaining the interpretability necessary for inference--a quality often lacking in general-purpose deep learning architectures. We evaluate our architecture using revealed commuting choice data, extended with travel times and trip costs for each travel mode for work-related trips in New York City, as well as 2016 U.S. election data aggregated by county, to test its performance on datasets with highly imbalanced classes. Given the interpretability of our models, we can estimate relevant economic metrics, such as the value of travel time savings in New York City. Finally, we compare the predictive performance and behavioral insights from our architecture to those derived from traditional discrete choice and general-purpose deep learning models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.

Builds on

14 of 32 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
  5. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  6. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  7. 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 857
  8. 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
  9. 2020Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models Out-performs Graph Neural Networkscited by 199
  10. 2020The Case for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 68
  11. 2020A Neural-embedded Choice Model: TasteNet-MNL Modeling Taste Heterogeneity with Flexibility and Interpretabilitycited by 20
  12. 2021Combining Discrete Choice Models and Neural Networks through Embeddings: Formulation, Interpretability and Performancecited by 9
2 more
  1. 2022Graph-Based Methods for Discrete Choicecited by 6
  2. 2024Deep neural networks for choice analysis: Enhancing behavioral regularity with gradient regularizationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.