mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Feasible is Augmenting Fake Nodes with Learnable Features as a Counter-strategy against Link Stealing Attacks?

arXiv 2503.09726 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are widely used and deployed for graph-based prediction tasks. However, as good as GNNs are for learning graph data, they also come with the risk of privacy leakage. For instance, an attacker can run carefully crafted queries on the GNNs and, from the responses, can infer the existence of an edge between a pair of nodes. This attack, dubbed as a "link-stealing" attack, can jeopardize the user's privacy by leaking potentially sensitive information. To protect against this attack, we propose an approach called "(N)ode (A)ugmentation for (R)estricting (G)raphs from (I)nsinuating their (S)tructure" (NARGIS) and study its feasibility. NARGIS is focused on reshaping the graph embedding space so that the posterior from the GNN model will still provide utility for the prediction task but will introduce ambiguity for the link-stealing attackers. To this end, NARGIS applies spectral clustering on the given graph to facilitate it being augmented with new nodes -- that have learned features instead of fixed ones. It utilizes tri-level optimization for learning parameters for the GNN model, surrogate attacker model, and our defense model (i.e. learnable node features). We extensively evaluate NARGIS on three benchmark citation datasets over eight knowledge availability settings for the attackers. We also evaluate the model fidelity and defense performance on influence-based link inference attacks. Through our studies, we have figured out the best feature of NARGIS -- its superior fidelity-privacy performance trade-off in a significant number of cases. We also have discovered in which cases the model needs to be improved, and proposed ways to integrate different schemes to make the model more robust against link stealing attacks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  5. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  6. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,382
  7. 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 976
  8. 2020Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 494
  9. 2020GNNGuard: Defending Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial Attackscited by 195
  10. 2020Stealing Links from Graph Neural Networkscited by 115
  11. 2021TDGIA:Effective Injection Attacks on Graph Neural Networkscited by 67
  12. 2021LinkTeller: Recovering Private Edges from Graph Neural Networks via Influence Analysiscited by 65
7 more
  1. 2022Understanding and Improving Graph Injection Attack by Promoting Unnoticeabilitycited by 62
  2. 2021A Survey of Machine Learning for Computer Architecture and Systemscited by 53
  3. 2020Scalable Attack on Graph Data by Injecting Vicious Nodescited by 50
  4. 2018Attack Graph Convolutional Networks by Adding Fake Nodescited by 26
  5. 2023On Strengthening and Defending Graph Reconstruction Attack with Markov Chain Approximationcited by 16
  6. 2022LPGNet: Link Private Graph Networks for Node Classificationcited by 12
  7. 2023Blink: Link Local Differential Privacy in Graph Neural Networks via Bayesian Estimationcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.