Towards Regulatory-Confirmed Adaptive Clinical Trials: Machine Learning Opportunities and Solutions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating the effect of new medical treatments. Treatments must pass stringent regulatory conditions in order to be approved for widespread use, yet even after the regulatory barriers are crossed, real-world challenges might arise: Who should get the treatment? What is its true clinical utility? Are there discrepancies in the treatment effectiveness across diverse and under-served populations? We introduce two new objectives for future clinical trials that integrate regulatory constraints and treatment policy value for both the entire population and under-served populations, thus answering some of the questions above in advance. Designed to meet these objectives, we formulate Randomize First Augment Next (RFAN), a new framework for designing Phase III clinical trials. Our framework consists of a standard randomized component followed by an adaptive one, jointly meant to efficiently and safely acquire and assign patients into treatment arms during the trial. Then, we propose strategies for implementing RFAN based on causal, deep Bayesian active learning. Finally, we empirically evaluate the performance of our framework using synthetic and real-world semi-synthetic datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.
Builds on
16 of 108 references.
References · 16
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
- 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
- 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 114
- 2019Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combinationcited by 79
- 2019Pure Exploration with Multiple Correct Answerscited by 64
- 2018Interval Estimation of Individual-Level Causal Effects Under Unobserved Confoundingcited by 51
- 2021Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational Datacited by 28
- 2021Fair Exploration via Axiomatic Bargainingcited by 22
- 2018A Contextual-bandit-based Approach for Informed Decision-making in Clinical Trialscited by 18
- 2023Fair Off-Policy Learning from Observational Datacited by 11
- 2020Response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials: from myths to practical considerationscited by 10
- 2020Contextual Constrained Learning for Dose-Finding Clinical Trialscited by 9
4 more
- 2021SDF-Bayes: Cautious Optimism in Safe Dose-Finding Clinical Trials with Drug Combinations and Heterogeneous Patient Groupscited by 6
- 2021Challenges in Statistical Analysis of Data Collected by a Bandit Algorithm: An Empirical Exploration in Applications to Adaptively Randomized Experimentscited by 6
- 2022Best Arm Identification with Contextual Information under a Small Gapcited by 3
- 2022Adaptive Identification of Populations with Treatment Benefit in Clinical Trials: Machine Learning Challenges and Solutionscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.