mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluation of state-of-the-art deep learning models in the segmentation of the heart ventricles in parasternal short-axis echocardiograms

arXiv 2503.08970 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2025eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous studies on echocardiogram segmentation are focused on the left ventricle in parasternal long-axis views. In this study, deep-learning models were evaluated on the segmentation of the ventricles in parasternal short-axis echocardiograms (PSAX-echo). Segmentation of the ventricles in complementary echocardiogram views will allow the computation of important metrics with the potential to aid in diagnosing cardio-pulmonary diseases and other cardiomyopathies. Evaluating state-of-the-art models with small datasets can reveal if they improve performance on limited data. PSAX-echo were performed on 33 volunteer women. An experienced cardiologist identified end-diastole and end-systole frames from 387 scans, and expert observers manually traced the contours of the cardiac structures. Traced frames were pre-processed and used to create labels to train 2 specific-domain (Unet-Resnet101 and Unet-ResNet50), and 4 general-domain (3 Segment Anything (SAM) variants, and the Detectron2) deep-learning models. The performance of the models was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and difference in cross-sectional area (DCSA). The Unet-Resnet101 model provided superior performance in the segmentation of the ventricles with 0.83, 4.93 pixels, and 106 pixel2 on average for DSC, HD, and DCSA respectively. A fine-tuned MedSAM model provided a performance of 0.82, 6.66 pixels, and 1252 pixel2, while the Detectron2 model provided 0.78, 2.12 pixels, and 116 pixel2 for the same metrics respectively. Deep-learning models are suitable for the segmentation of the left and right ventricles in PSAX-echo. This study demonstrated that specific-domain trained models such as Unet-ResNet provide higher accuracy for echo segmentation than general-domain segmentation models when working with small and locally acquired datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.

Builds on

14 of 58 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  5. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  6. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
  7. 2019Deep Learning for Segmentation using an Open Large-Scale Dataset in 2D Echocardiographycited by 243
  8. 2018Adversarial Learning for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 173
  9. 2019Deep learning for cardiac image segmentation: A reviewcited by 131
  10. 2021Echocardiography Segmentation with Enforced Temporal Consistencycited by 30
  11. 2018Evaluating the Impact of Intensity Normalization on MR Image Synthesiscited by 26
  12. 2021CFPNet: Channel-wise Feature Pyramid for Real-Time Semantic Segmentationcited by 14
2 more
  1. 2023GL-Fusion: Global-Local Fusion Network for Multi-view Echocardiogram Video Segmentationcited by 4
  2. 2024EchoONE: Segmenting Multiple echocardiography Planes in One Modelcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.