Evaluation of state-of-the-art deep learning models in the segmentation of the heart ventricles in parasternal short-axis echocardiograms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Previous studies on echocardiogram segmentation are focused on the left ventricle in parasternal long-axis views. In this study, deep-learning models were evaluated on the segmentation of the ventricles in parasternal short-axis echocardiograms (PSAX-echo). Segmentation of the ventricles in complementary echocardiogram views will allow the computation of important metrics with the potential to aid in diagnosing cardio-pulmonary diseases and other cardiomyopathies. Evaluating state-of-the-art models with small datasets can reveal if they improve performance on limited data. PSAX-echo were performed on 33 volunteer women. An experienced cardiologist identified end-diastole and end-systole frames from 387 scans, and expert observers manually traced the contours of the cardiac structures. Traced frames were pre-processed and used to create labels to train 2 specific-domain (Unet-Resnet101 and Unet-ResNet50), and 4 general-domain (3 Segment Anything (SAM) variants, and the Detectron2) deep-learning models. The performance of the models was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and difference in cross-sectional area (DCSA). The Unet-Resnet101 model provided superior performance in the segmentation of the ventricles with 0.83, 4.93 pixels, and 106 pixel2 on average for DSC, HD, and DCSA respectively. A fine-tuned MedSAM model provided a performance of 0.82, 6.66 pixels, and 1252 pixel2, while the Detectron2 model provided 0.78, 2.12 pixels, and 116 pixel2 for the same metrics respectively. Deep-learning models are suitable for the segmentation of the left and right ventricles in PSAX-echo. This study demonstrated that specific-domain trained models such as Unet-ResNet provide higher accuracy for echo segmentation than general-domain segmentation models when working with small and locally acquired datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.
Builds on
14 of 58 references.
References · 14
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
- 2019Deep Learning for Segmentation using an Open Large-Scale Dataset in 2D Echocardiographycited by 243
- 2018Adversarial Learning for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 173
- 2019Deep learning for cardiac image segmentation: A reviewcited by 131
- 2021Echocardiography Segmentation with Enforced Temporal Consistencycited by 30
- 2018Evaluating the Impact of Intensity Normalization on MR Image Synthesiscited by 26
- 2021CFPNet: Channel-wise Feature Pyramid for Real-Time Semantic Segmentationcited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.