AI for Just Work: Constructing Diverse Imaginations of AI beyond "Replacing Humans"
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
"why" we develop AI. Lacking critical reflections on the general visions and purposes of AI may make the community vulnerable to manipulation. In this position paper, we explore the "why" question of AI. We denote answers to the "why" question the imaginations of AI, which depict our general visions, frames, and mindsets for the prospects of AI. We identify that the prevailing vision in the AI community is largely a monoculture that emphasizes objectives such as replacing humans and improving productivity. Our critical examination of this mainstream imagination highlights its underpinning and potentially unjust assumptions. We then call to diversify our collective imaginations of AI, embedding ethical assumptions from the outset in the imaginations of AI. To facilitate the community's pursuit of diverse imaginations, we demonstrate one process for constructing a new imagination of "AI for just work," and showcase its application in the medical image synthesis task to make it more ethical. We hope this work will help the AI community to open critical dialogues with civil society on the visions and purposes of AI, and inspire more technical works and advocacy in pursuit of diverse and ethical imaginations to restore the value of AI for the public good.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.
Builds on
11 of 111 references.
References · 11
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 349
- 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
- 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
- 2018Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarshipcited by 108
- 2021Reduced, Reused and Recycled: The Life of a Dataset in Machine Learning Researchcited by 102
- 2022The Turing Trap: The Promise & Peril of Human-Like Artificial Intelligencecited by 42
- 2024Application-Driven Innovation in Machine Learningcited by 24
- 2024Position: Why We Must Rethink Empirical Research in Machine Learningcited by 19
- 2024From Protoscience to Epistemic Monoculture: How Benchmarking Set the Stage for the Deep Learning Revolutioncited by 12
- 2025Stop treating `AGI' as the north-star goal of AI researchcited by 11
- 2023Why is plausibility surprisingly problematic as an XAI criterion?cited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026AI Evaluation Should Work With Humanscited by 0
- 2026An Investigation of the NeurIPS and ICML 2025 Position Trackscited by 0
- 2026An Investigation of the NeurIPS and ICML 2025 Position Tracks6 Jul 2026
- 2026AI Evaluation Should Work With Humans6 Jul 2026