mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Domain Adaptation and Entanglement: an Optimal Transport Perspective

arXiv 2503.08155 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2025cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current machine learning systems are brittle in the face of distribution shifts (DS), where the target distribution that the system is tested on differs from the source distribution used to train the system. This problem of robustness to DS has been studied extensively in the field of domain adaptation. For deep neural networks, a popular framework for unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) is domain matching, in which algorithms try to align the marginal distributions in the feature or output space. The current theoretical understanding of these methods, however, is limited and existing theoretical results are not precise enough to characterize their performance in practice. In this paper, we derive new bounds based on optimal transport that analyze the UDA problem. Our new bounds include a term which we dub as entanglement, consisting of an expectation of Wasserstein distance between conditionals with respect to changing data distributions. Analysis of the entanglement term provides a novel perspective on the unoptimizable aspects of UDA. In various experiments with multiple models across several DS scenarios, we show that this term can be used to explain the varying performance of UDA algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2025.

Builds on

24 of 49 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  4. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  6. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  7. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
  8. 2018A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 361
  9. 2017Joint Distribution Optimal Transportation for Domain Adaptationcited by 280
  10. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
  11. 2018A DIRT-T Approach to Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 215
  12. 2018DeepJDOT: Deep Joint Distribution Optimal Transport for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 212
12 more
  1. 2020Understanding Self-Training for Gradual Domain Adaptationcited by 149
  2. 2018Domain Generalization via Conditional Invariant Representationcited by 146
  3. 2020Domain Adaptation with Conditional Distribution Matching and Generalized Label Shiftcited by 124
  4. 2016Theoretical Analysis of Domain Adaptation with Optimal Transportcited by 105
  5. 2019Support and Invertibility in Domain-Invariant Representationscited by 87
  6. 2021f-Domain-Adversarial Learning: Theory and Algorithmscited by 47
  7. 2019d-SNE: Domain Adaptation using Stochastic Neighborhood Embeddingcited by 40
  8. 2021KL Guided Domain Adaptationcited by 35
  9. 2021An Information-theoretic Approach to Distribution Shiftscited by 25
  10. 2021Mapping conditional distributions for domain adaptation under generalized target shiftcited by 18
  11. 2022Information-Theoretic Analysis of Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 15
  12. 2024On f-Divergence Principled Domain Adaptation: An Improved Frameworkcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.