Datasets, Documents, and Repetitions: The Practicalities of Unequal Data Quality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data filtering has become a powerful tool for improving model performance while reducing computational cost. However, as large language model compute budgets continue to grow, the limited data volume provided by heavily filtered and deduplicated datasets will become a practical constraint. In efforts to better understand how to proceed, we study model performance at various compute budgets and across multiple pre-training datasets created through data filtering and deduplication. We find that, given appropriate modifications to the training recipe, repeating existing aggressively filtered datasets for up to ten epochs can outperform training on the ten times larger superset for a single epoch across multiple compute budget orders of magnitude. While this finding relies on repeating the dataset for many epochs, we also investigate repeats within these datasets at the document level. We find that not all documents within a dataset are equal, and we can create better datasets relative to a token budget by explicitly manipulating the counts of individual documents. We conclude by arguing that even as large language models scale, data filtering remains an important direction of research.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.
Builds on
27 of 34 references.
References · 27
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
15 more
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 992
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
- 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 763
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
- 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
- 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
- 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 403
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 398
- 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 314
- 2024Scaling Laws for Data Filtering -- Data Curation cannot be Compute Agnosticcited by 77
- 2024Maximize Your Data's Potential: Enhancing LLM Accuracy with Two-Phase Pretrainingcited by 26
- 2025LLM360 K2: Building a 65B 360-Open-Source Large Language Model from Scratchcited by 15
- 2024Zyda-2: a 5 Trillion Token High-Quality Datasetcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.
8 papers.
- 2025OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Modelscited by 304
- 2026A Bitter Lesson for Data Filteringcited by 8
- 2025Reusing Pre-Training Data at Test Time is a Compute Multipliercited by 4
- 2026Quantifying the Effect of Test Set Contamination on Generative Evaluationscited by 2
- 2026DataComp-VLM: Improved Open Datasets for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Data Scarcity and Model Sparsity: Mixtures-of-Experts Overfit More to Repeated Datacited by 2
- 2026Repetition over Diversity: High-Signal Data Filtering for Sample-Efficient German Language Modelingcited by 0
- 2026Scaling Repeated-Data Pretraining: Batch Size, Regularization, and GPU-Time Tradeoffscited by 0
- 2026Scaling Repeated-Data Pretraining: Batch Size, Regularization, and GPU-Time Tradeoffs11 Oct 2026
- 2026Data Scarcity and Model Sparsity: Mixtures-of-Experts Overfit More to Repeated Data10 Sep 2026
- 2026DataComp-VLM: Improved Open Datasets for Vision-Language Models26 Jun 2026
- 2026A Bitter Lesson for Data Filtering19 May 2026
- 2026Repetition over Diversity: High-Signal Data Filtering for Sample-Efficient German Language Modeling30 Apr 2026
- 2026Quantifying the Effect of Test Set Contamination on Generative Evaluations7 Jan 2026
- 2025Reusing Pre-Training Data at Test Time is a Compute Multiplier6 Nov 2025
- 2025OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models4 Jun 2025