A Representationalist, Functionalist and Naturalistic Conception of Intelligence as a Foundation for AGI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The article analyses foundational principles relevant to the creation of artificial general intelligence (AGI). Intelligence is understood as the ability to create novel skills that allow to achieve goals under previously unknown conditions. To this end, intelligence utilises reasoning methods such as deduction, induction and abduction as well as other methods such as abstraction and classification to develop a world model. The methods are applied to indirect and incomplete representations of the world, which are obtained through perception, for example, and which do not depict the world but only correspond to it. Due to these limitations and the uncertain and contingent nature of reasoning, the world model is constructivist. Its value is functionally determined by its viability, i.e., its potential to achieve the desired goals. In consequence, meaning is assigned to representations by attributing them a function that makes it possible to achieve a goal. This representational and functional conception of intelligence enables a naturalistic interpretation that does not presuppose mental features, such as intentionality and consciousness, which are regarded as independent of intelligence. Based on a phenomenological analysis, it is shown that AGI can gain a more fundamental access to the world than humans, although it is limited by the No Free Lunch theorems, which require assumptions to be made.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.
Builds on
9 of 83 references.
References · 9
- 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 503
- 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 407
- 2023Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Taskscited by 246
- 2023Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solvecited by 178
- 2023MotionLM: Multi-Agent Motion Forecasting as Language Modelingcited by 156
- 2024Alice in Wonderland: Simple Tasks Showing Complete Reasoning Breakdown in State-Of-the-Art Large Language Modelscited by 68
- 2022On the Principles of Parsimony and Self-Consistency for the Emergence of Intelligencecited by 50
- 2022Abstraction for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
- 2025Understanding and Benchmarking Artificial Intelligence: OpenAI's o3 Is Not AGIcited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026An Alternative Trajectory for Generative AIcited by 1
- 2026An Alternative Trajectory for Generative AI14 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022A World-Self Model Towards Understanding Intelligence
- 2025On the Definition of Intelligence
- 2023Concepts is All You Need: A More Direct Path to AGI
- 2026Emergence is Overrated: AGI as an Archipelago of Experts
- 2025Beyond World Models: Rethinking Understanding in AI Models
- 2024Sora and V-JEPA Have Not Learned The Complete Real World Model -- A Philosophical Analysis of Video AIs Through the Theory of Productive Imagination
- 2023Brain in a Vat: On Missing Pieces Towards Artificial General Intelligence in Large Language Models
- 2023From task structures to world models: What do LLMs know?