Hidden in Plain Sight -- Class Competition Focuses Attribution Maps
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Attribution methods reveal which input features a neural network uses for a prediction, adding transparency to their decisions. A common problem is that these attributions seem unspecific, highlighting both important and irrelevant features. We revisit the common attribution pipeline and observe that using logits as attribution target is a main cause of this phenomenon. We show that the solution is in plain sight: considering distributions of attributions over multiple classes using existing attribution methods yields specific and fine-grained attributions. On common benchmarks, including the grid-pointing game and randomization-based sanity checks, this improves the ability of 18 attribution methods across 7 architectures up to 2x, agnostic to model architecture.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.
Builds on
32 of 39 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
20 more
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
- 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
- 2019XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regionscited by 116
- 2021PartImageNet: A Large, High-Quality Dataset of Partscited by 107
- 2022B-cos Networks: Alignment is All We Need for Interpretabilitycited by 88
- 2025ConceptAttention: Diffusion Transformers Learn Highly Interpretable Featurescited by 48
- 2022Towards Better Understanding Attribution Methodscited by 28
- 2020A Framework to Learn with Interpretationcited by 23
- 2022Shortcomings of Top-Down Randomization-Based Sanity Checks for Evaluations of Deep Neural Network Explanationscited by 22
- 2024IG2: Integrated Gradient on Iterative Gradient Path for Feature Attributioncited by 12
- 2025How to Probe: Simple Yet Effective Techniques for Improving Post-hoc Explanationscited by 8
- 2024Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation with Conservation Property for ResNetcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.