mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Probabilistic Modeling of Jailbreak on Multimodal LLMs: From Quantification to Application

arXiv 2503.06989 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2025cs.CR cs.CVcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated their superior ability in understanding multimodal content. However, they remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, which exploit weaknesses in their safety alignment to generate harmful responses. Previous studies categorize jailbreaks as successful or failed based on whether responses contain malicious content. However, given the stochastic nature of MLLM responses, this binary classification of an input's ability to jailbreak MLLMs is inappropriate. Derived from this viewpoint, we introduce jailbreak probability to quantify the jailbreak potential of an input, which represents the likelihood that MLLMs generated a malicious response when prompted with this input. We approximate this probability through multiple queries to MLLMs. After modeling the relationship between input hidden states and their corresponding jailbreak probability using Jailbreak Probability Prediction Network (JPPN), we use continuous jailbreak probability for optimization. Specifically, we propose Jailbreak-Probability-based Attack (JPA) that optimizes adversarial perturbations on input image to maximize jailbreak probability, and further enhance it as Multimodal JPA (MJPA) by including monotonic text rephrasing. To counteract attacks, we also propose Jailbreak-Probability-based Finetuning (JPF), which minimizes jailbreak probability through MLLM parameter updates. Extensive experiments show that (1) (M)JPA yields significant improvements when attacking a wide range of models under both white and black box settings. (2) JPF vastly reduces jailbreaks by at most over 60%. Both of the above results demonstrate the significance of introducing jailbreak probability to make nuanced distinctions among input jailbreak abilities.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 47 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.

Builds on

47 of 60 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Distraction is All You Need for Multimodal Large Language Model Jailbreaking15 Feb
  2. 2024Jailbreak Vision Language Models via Bi-Modal Adversarial Prompt6 Jun
  3. 2024Images are Achilles' Heel of Alignment: Exploiting Visual Vulnerabilities for Jailbreaking Multimodal Large Language Models14 Mar
  4. 2024Eyes Closed, Safety On: Protecting Multimodal LLMs via Image-to-Text Transformation14 Mar
  5. 2024AdaShield: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models from Structure-based Attack via Adaptive Shield Prompting14 Mar
  6. 2024Safety of Multimodal Large Language Models on Images and Texts1 Feb
  7. 2024MLLM-Protector: Ensuring MLLM's Safety without Hurting Performance5 Jan
  8. 2023MM-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models29 Nov
  9. 2023FigStep: Jailbreaking Large Vision-Language Models via Typographic Visual Prompts9 Nov
  10. 2023How Robust is Google's Bard to Adversarial Image Attacks?21 Sep
  11. 2023Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional Adversarial Attacks on Multi-Modal Language Models26 Jul
  12. 2023Set-level Guidance Attack: Boosting Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Pre-training Models26 Jul
2 more
  1. 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models22 Jun
  2. 2022Towards Adversarial Attack on Vision-Language Pre-training Models19 Jun

Other references · 33

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  7. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  8. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  9. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  10. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  11. 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,689
  12. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
21 more
  1. 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,221
  2. 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 898
  3. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  4. 2024DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understandingcited by 718
  5. 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 494
  6. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Ciphercited by 401
  7. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 352
  8. 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreakercited by 337
  9. 2023Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?cited by 305
  10. 2023InternLM-XComposer: A Vision-Language Large Model for Advanced Text-image Comprehension and Compositioncited by 297
  11. 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 215
  12. 2024Aligning Modalities in Vision Large Language Models via Preference Fine-tuningcited by 197
  13. 2023Image Hijacks: Adversarial Images can Control Generative Models at Runtimecited by 165
  14. 2024Safety Fine-Tuning at (Almost) No Cost: A Baseline for Vision Large Language Modelscited by 160
  15. 2024Jailbreaking Attack against Multimodal Large Language Modelcited by 128
  16. 2024Groma: Localized Visual Tokenization for Grounding Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 118
  17. 2023BuboGPT: Enabling Visual Grounding in Multi-Modal LLMscited by 114
  18. 2023AutoDAN: Interpretable Gradient-Based Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 102
  19. 2024How Alignment and Jailbreak Work: Explain LLM Safety through Intermediate Hidden Statescited by 92
  20. 2024Strengthening Multimodal Large Language Model with Bootstrapped Preference Optimizationcited by 75
  21. 2024Jailbreak Large Vision-Language Models Through Multi-Modal Linkagecited by 53

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024JailBreakV: A Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of MultiModal Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks
  2. 2024From LLMs to MLLMs: Exploring the Landscape of Multimodal Jailbreaking
  3. 2024textitMMJ-Bench: A Comprehensive Study on Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses for Multimodal Large Language Models
  4. 2024Efficient LLM-Jailbreaking via Multimodal-LLM Jailbreak
  5. 2025JPS: Jailbreak Multimodal Large Language Models with Collaborative Visual Perturbation and Textual Steering
  6. 2024Divide and Conquer: A Hybrid Strategy Defeats Multimodal Large Language Models
  7. 2025Align is not Enough: Multimodal Universal Jailbreak Attack against Multimodal Large Language Models
  8. 2025Jailbreaking Multimodal Large Language Models via Shuffle Inconsistency