Approximate Size Targets Are Sufficient for Accurate Semantic Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper demonstrates a surprising result for segmentation with image-level targets: extending binary class tags to approximate relative object-size distributions allows off-the-shelf architectures to solve the segmentation problem. A straightforward zero-avoiding KL-divergence loss for average predictions produces segmentation accuracy comparable to the standard pixel-precise supervision with full ground truth masks. In contrast, current results based on class tags typically require complex non-reproducible architectural modifications and specialized multi-stage training procedures. Our ideas are validated on PASCAL VOC using our new human annotations of approximate object sizes. We also show the results on COCO and medical data using synthetically corrupted size targets. All standard networks demonstrate robustness to the size targets' errors. For some classes, the validation accuracy is significantly better than the pixel-level supervision; the latter is not robust to errors in the masks. Our work provides new ideas and insights on image-level supervision in segmentation and may encourage other simple general solutions to the problem.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.
Builds on
23 of 33 references.
References · 23
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
- 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
- 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
- 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 554
- 2018Invariant Information Clustering for Unsupervised Image Classification and Segmentationcited by 455
- 2016ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 331
- 2018Learning Pixel-level Semantic Affinity with Image-level Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 321
- 2016Seed, Expand and Constrain: Three Principles for Weakly-Supervised Image Segmentationcited by 198
- 2015Weakly- and Semi-Supervised Learning of a DCNN for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 189
11 more
- 2016Wider or Deeper: Revisiting the ResNet Model for Visual Recognitioncited by 184
- 2020Single-Stage Semantic Segmentation from Image Labelscited by 167
- 2021PiCIE: Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation using Invariance and Equivariance in Clusteringcited by 163
- 2018On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 121
- 2022Learning Affinity from Attention: End-to-End Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 118
- 2015Constrained Convolutional Neural Networks for Weakly Supervised Segmentationcited by 100
- 2019SegSort: Segmentation by Discriminative Sorting of Segmentscited by 96
- 2021Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation by Pixel-to-Prototype Contrastcited by 85
- 2022Regional Semantic Contrast and Aggregation for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 64
- 2018Deep clustering: On the link between discriminative models and K-meanscited by 37
- 2018Fluid Annotation: A Human-Machine Collaboration Interface for Full Image Annotationcited by 16
Built on by
Not cited yet.