mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Attention, Please! PixelSHAP Reveals What Vision-Language Models Actually Focus On

arXiv 2503.06670 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2025cs.CV cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Interpretability in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) is crucial for trust, debugging, and decision-making in high-stakes applications. We introduce PixelSHAP, a model-agnostic framework extending Shapley-based analysis to structured visual entities. Unlike previous methods focusing on text prompts, PixelSHAP applies to vision-based reasoning by systematically perturbing image objects and quantifying their influence on a VLM's response. PixelSHAP requires no model internals, operating solely on input-output pairs, making it compatible with open-source and commercial models. It supports diverse embedding-based similarity metrics and scales efficiently using optimization techniques inspired by Shapley-based methods. We validate PixelSHAP in autonomous driving, highlighting its ability to enhance interpretability. Key challenges include segmentation sensitivity and object occlusion. Our open-source implementation facilitates further research.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2025.

Builds on

15 of 22 references.

References · 15

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  5. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  6. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  7. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  8. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  9. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
  10. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
  11. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 582
  12. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 259
3 more
  1. 2021FastSHAP: Real-Time Shapley Value Estimationcited by 125
  2. 2019XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regionscited by 116
  3. 2024TokenSHAP: Interpreting Large Language Models with Monte Carlo Shapley Value Estimationcited by 42

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling
  2. 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding
  3. 2026Do Vision-Language Models Truly Perform Vision Reasoning? A Rigorous Study of the Modality Gap
  4. 2024NPHardEval4V: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models with Effects of Vision
  5. 2026The Last Visible Pixel: Probing Fine-Scale Perception in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026UVLM: A Universal Vision-Language Model Loader for Reproducible Multimodal Benchmarking
  7. 2025VLMs Guided Interpretable Decision Making for Autonomous Driving
  8. 2025VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMs