mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Intent-Aware Self-Correction for Mitigating Social Biases in Large Language Models

arXiv 2503.06011 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-Correction based on feedback improves the output quality of Large Language Models (LLMs). Moreover, as Self-Correction functions like the slow and conscious System-2 thinking from cognitive psychology's perspective, it can potentially reduce LLMs' social biases. LLMs are sensitive to contextual ambiguities and inconsistencies; therefore, explicitly communicating their intentions during interactions when applying Self-Correction for debiasing is crucial. In this study, we demonstrate that clarifying intentions is essential for effectively reducing biases in LLMs through Self-Correction. We divide the components needed for Self-Correction into three parts: instruction, response, and feedback, and clarify intentions at each component. We incorporate an explicit debiasing prompt to convey the intention of bias mitigation from the instruction for response generation. In the response, we use Chain-of-Thought (CoT) to clarify the reasoning process. In the feedback, we define evaluation aspects necessary for debiasing and propose clear feedback through multi-aspect critiques and scoring. Through experiments, we demonstrate that self-correcting CoT responses obtained from a debiasing prompt based on multi-aspect feedback can reduce biased responses more robustly and consistently than the baselines. We also find the variation in debiasing efficacy when using models with different bias levels or separating models for response and feedback generation.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2025.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  5. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  6. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  7. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
  8. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
  9. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 1,017
  10. 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 1,011
  11. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 783
  12. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
12 more
  1. 2023Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoningcited by 391
  2. 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 296
  3. 2024When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMscited by 240
  4. 2022On Second Thought, Let's Not Think Step by Step! Bias and Toxicity in Zero-Shot Reasoningcited by 194
  5. 2023KoBBQ: Korean Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 71
  6. 2022Gender Bias in Masked Language Models for Multiple Languagescited by 60
  7. 2024Evaluating Gender Bias in Large Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 50
  8. 2024Social Bias Evaluation for Large Language Models Requires Prompt Variationscited by 40
  9. 2024MBBQ: A Dataset for Cross-Lingual Comparison of Stereotypes in Generative LLMscited by 35
  10. 2022Gender Biases and Where to Find Them: Exploring Gender Bias in Pre-Trained Transformer-based Language Models Using Movement Pruningcited by 21
  11. 2023Evaluating Gender Bias of Pre-trained Language Models in Natural Language Inference by Considering All Labelscited by 16
  12. 2023SAIE Framework: Support Alone Isn't Enough -- Advancing LLM Training with Adversarial Remarkscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Self-Debias: Self-correcting for Debiasing Large Language Models
  2. 2024Large Language Models have Intrinsic Self-Correction Ability
  3. 2024A Theoretical Understanding of Self-Correction through In-context Alignment
  4. 2024Smaller Large Language Models Can Do Moral Self-Correction
  5. 2024Pride and Prejudice: LLM Amplifies Self-Bias in Self-Refinement
  6. 2024Self-Reflection Makes Large Language Models Safer, Less Biased, and Ideologically Neutral
  7. 2024Confidence v.s. Critique: A Decomposition of Self-Correction Capability for LLMs
  8. 2025Language Models can perform Single-Utterance Self-Correction of Perturbed Reasoning