TomatoScanner: phenotyping tomato fruit based on only RGB image
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In tomato greenhouse, phenotypic measurement is meaningful for researchers and farmers to monitor crop growth, thereby precisely control environmental conditions in time, leading to better quality and higher yield. Traditional phenotyping mainly relies on manual measurement, which is accurate but inefficient, more importantly, endangering the health and safety of people. Several studies have explored computer vision-based methods to replace manual phenotyping. However, the 2D-based need extra calibration, or cause destruction to fruit, or can only measure limited and meaningless traits. The 3D-based need extra depth camera, which is expensive and unacceptable for most farmers. In this paper, we propose a non-contact tomato fruit phenotyping method, titled TomatoScanner, where RGB image is all you need for input. First, pixel feature is extracted by instance segmentation of our proposed EdgeYOLO with preprocessing of individual separation and pose correction. Second, depth feature is extracted by depth estimation of Depth Pro. Third, pixel and depth feature are fused to output phenotype results in reality. We establish self-built Tomato Phenotype Dataset to test TomatoScanner, which achieves excellent phenotyping on width, height, vertical area and volume, with median relative error of 5.63%, 7.03%, -0.64% and 37.06%, respectively. We propose and add three innovative modules - EdgeAttention, EdgeLoss and EdgeBoost - into EdgeYOLO, to enhance the segmentation accuracy on edge portion. Precision and mean Edge Error greatly improve from 0.943 and 5.641% to 0.986 and 2.963%, respectively. Meanwhile, EdgeYOLO keeps lightweight and efficient, with 48.7 M weights size and 76.34 FPS. Codes and datasets: https://github.com/AlexTraveling/TomatoScanner.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2025.
Builds on
12 of 28 references.
References · 12
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
- 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
- 2019YOLACT: Real-time Instance Segmentationcited by 443
- 2024Depth Pro: Sharp Monocular Metric Depth in Less Than a Secondcited by 404
- 2022RTMDet: An Empirical Study of Designing Real-Time Object Detectorscited by 195
- 2023DiffuMask: Synthesizing Images with Pixel-level Annotations for Semantic Segmentation Using Diffusion Modelscited by 162
- 2023DVIS: Decoupled Video Instance Segmentation Frameworkcited by 77
- 2023CTVIS: Consistent Training for Online Video Instance Segmentationcited by 51
- 2023Logic-induced Diagnostic Reasoning for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 29
- 2023Betrayed by Captions: Joint Caption Grounding and Generation for Open Vocabulary Instance Segmentationcited by 28
- 2023Look how they have grown: Non-destructive Leaf Detection and Size Estimation of Tomato Plants for 3D Growth Monitoringcited by 1
- 2023Visual based Tomato Size Measurement System for an Indoor Farming Environmentcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.