How Personality Traits Shape LLM Risk-Taking Behaviour
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, necessitating a deeper understanding of their decision-making behaviour under risk. This study investigates the relationship between LLMs' personality traits and risk propensity, employing cumulative prospect theory (CPT) and the Big Five personality framework. We focus on GPT-4o, comparing its behaviour to human baselines and earlier models. Our findings reveal that GPT-4o exhibits higher Conscientiousness and Agreeableness traits compared to human averages, while functioning as a risk-neutral rational agent in prospect selection. Interventions on GPT-4o's Big Five traits, particularly Openness, significantly influence its risk propensity, mirroring patterns observed in human studies. Notably, Openness emerges as the most influential factor in GPT-4o's risk propensity, aligning with human findings. In contrast, legacy models like GPT-4-Turbo demonstrate inconsistent generalization of the personality-risk relationship. This research advances our understanding of LLM behaviour under risk and elucidates the potential and limitations of personality-based interventions in shaping LLM decision-making. Our findings have implications for the development of more robust and predictable AI systems such as financial modelling.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
31 of 78 references.
References · 31
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
- 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 893
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2024Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agentscited by 400
- 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 389
19 more
- 2024LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individualscited by 235
- 2023Personality Traits in Large Language Modelscited by 166
- 2023FinMem: A Performance-Enhanced LLM Trading Agent with Layered Memory and Character Designcited by 163
- 2024Political Compass or Spinning Arrow? Towards More Meaningful Evaluations for Values and Opinions in Large Language Modelscited by 162
- 2023In-Context Impersonation Reveals Large Language Models' Strengths and Biasescited by 154
- 2023EconAgent: Large Language Model-Empowered Agents for Simulating Macroeconomic Activitiescited by 154
- 2022Thinking Fast and Slow in Large Language Modelscited by 136
- 2022Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 122
- 2022Who is GPT-3? An Exploration of Personality, Values and Demographicscited by 112
- 2023Turning large language models into cognitive modelscited by 66
- 2024Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Surveycited by 60
- 2022Estimating the Personality of White-Box Language Modelscited by 47
- 2024LLM economicus? Mapping the Behavioral Biases of LLMs via Utility Theorycited by 44
- 2024Centaur: a foundation model of human cognitioncited by 34
- 2024Cultural Evolution of Cooperation among LLM Agentscited by 30
- 2023Challenging the Validity of Personality Tests for Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2024Simulating Financial Market via Large Language Model based Agentscited by 25
- 2024When AI Meets Finance (StockAgent): Large Language Model-based Stock Trading in Simulated Real-world Environmentscited by 25
- 2023Agent-based Modelling of Credit Card Promotionscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.
8 papers.
- 2025Psychometric Personality Shaping Modulates Capabilities and Safety in Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025Twenty Years of Personality Computing: Threats, Challenges and Future Directionscited by 2
- 2026Apparent Psychological Profiles of Large Language Models are Largely a Measurement Artifactcited by 2
- 2026FinPersona-Bench: A Benchmark for Longitudinal Psychometric Stability of Autonomous Financial Agentscited by 1
- 2025Who are you, ChatGPT? Personality and Demographic Style in LLM-Generated Contentcited by 0
- 2026The Shadow Self: Intrinsic Value Misalignment in Large Language Model Agentscited by 0
- 2026Assessing the Effectiveness of LLMs in Delivering Cognitive Behavioral Therapycited by 0
- 2026Large-Scale ChatBot Validation Through Customer Digital Twin Simulationscited by 0
- 2026FinPersona-Bench: A Benchmark for Longitudinal Psychometric Stability of Autonomous Financial Agents30 Jun 2026
- 2026Apparent Psychological Profiles of Large Language Models are Largely a Measurement Artifact18 Jun 2026
- 2026Large-Scale ChatBot Validation Through Customer Digital Twin Simulations15 May 2026
- 2026Assessing the Effectiveness of LLMs in Delivering Cognitive Behavioral Therapy4 Mar 2026
- 2026The Shadow Self: Intrinsic Value Misalignment in Large Language Model Agents24 Jan 2026
- 2025Who are you, ChatGPT? Personality and Demographic Style in LLM-Generated Content13 Oct 2025
- 2025Psychometric Personality Shaping Modulates Capabilities and Safety in Language Models19 Sep 2025
- 2025Twenty Years of Personality Computing: Threats, Challenges and Future Directions3 Mar 2025