Poisoning Bayesian Inference via Data Deletion and Replication
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Research in adversarial machine learning (AML) has shown that statistical models are vulnerable to maliciously altered data. However, despite advances in Bayesian machine learning models, most AML research remains concentrated on classical techniques. Therefore, we focus on extending the white-box model poisoning paradigm to attack generic Bayesian inference, highlighting its vulnerability in adversarial contexts. A suite of attacks are developed that allow an attacker to steer the Bayesian posterior toward a target distribution through the strategic deletion and replication of true observations, even when only sampling access to the posterior is available. Analytic properties of these algorithms are proven and their performance is empirically examined in both synthetic and real-world scenarios. With relatively little effort, the attacker is able to substantively alter the Bayesian's beliefs and, by accepting more risk, they can mold these beliefs to their will. By carefully constructing the adversarial posterior, surgical poisoning is achieved such that only targeted inferences are corrupted and others are minimally disturbed.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2025.
Builds on
20 of 38 references.
References · 20
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
- 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 254
- 2019Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyrocited by 187
- 2022Wild Patterns Reloaded: A Survey of Machine Learning Security against Training Data Poisoningcited by 93
- 2017Generative Poisoning Attack Method Against Neural Networkscited by 49
- 2020Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks to Gradient-Based Attackscited by 48
- 2023Towards Sustainable Learning: Coresets for Data-efficient Deep Learningcited by 44
8 more
- 2021A Review of Adversarial Attack and Defense for Classification Methodscited by 29
- 2019Sparse Variational Inference: Bayesian Coresets from Scratchcited by 28
- 2020An Automatic Finite-Sample Robustness Metric: When Can Dropping a Little Data Make a Big Difference?cited by 27
- 2022Support Vector Machines under Adversarial Label Contaminationcited by 15
- 2022Principal-Agent Hypothesis Testingcited by 13
- 2020Adversarial Machine Learning: Bayesian Perspectivescited by 8
- 2023Incentive-Theoretic Bayesian Inference for Collaborative Sciencecited by 4
- 2024Sensitivity of MCMC-based analyses to small-data removalcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Evasion Attacks Against Bayesian Predictive Modelscited by 1
- 2025Bayesian Decision Making around Expertscited by 0
- 2026Data-Poisoning Audits for Causal Effect Estimationcited by 0
- 2026Data-Poisoning Audits for Causal Effect Estimation22 Jul 2026
- 2025Bayesian Decision Making around Experts9 Oct 2025
- 2025Evasion Attacks Against Bayesian Predictive Models11 Jun 2025