Monitoring Decoding: Mitigating Hallucination via Evaluating the Factuality of Partial Response during Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While large language models have demonstrated exceptional performance across a wide range of tasks, they remain susceptible to hallucinations -- generating plausible yet factually incorrect contents. Existing methods to mitigating such risk often rely on sampling multiple full-length generations, which introduces significant response latency and becomes ineffective when the model consistently produces hallucinated outputs with high confidence. To address these limitations, we introduce Monitoring Decoding (MD), a novel framework that dynamically monitors the generation process and selectively applies in-process interventions, focusing on revising crucial tokens responsible for hallucinations. Instead of waiting until completion of multiple full-length generations, we identify hallucination-prone tokens during generation using a monitor function, and further refine these tokens through a tree-based decoding strategy. This approach ensures an enhanced factual accuracy and coherence in the generated output while maintaining efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that MD consistently outperforms self-consistency-based approaches in both effectiveness and efficiency, achieving higher factual accuracy while significantly reducing computational overhead.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2025.
Builds on
28 of 44 references.
References · 28
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,653
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
16 more
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
- 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 695
- 2023Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 445
- 2023Universal Self-Consistency for Large Language Model Generationcited by 203
- 2023Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Taskscited by 169
- 2021A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generationcited by 138
- 2024Pride and Prejudice: LLM Amplifies Self-Bias in Self-Refinementcited by 114
- 2023Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focuscited by 99
- 2024HaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination Detectioncited by 99
- 2023SAC3: Reliable Hallucination Detection in Black-Box Language Models via Semantic-aware Cross-check Consistencycited by 90
- 2024TreeBoN: Enhancing Inference-Time Alignment with Speculative Tree-Search and Best-of-N Samplingcited by 61
- 2024Do LLMs Know about Hallucination? An Empirical Investigation of LLM's Hidden Statescited by 52
- 2024Integrate the Essence and Eliminate the Dross: Fine-Grained Self-Consistency for Free-Form Language Generationcited by 21
- 2025TruthFlow: Truthful LLM Generation via Representation Flow Correctioncited by 14
- 2024Integrative Decoding: Improve Factuality via Implicit Self-consistencycited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Large Language Models Hallucination: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 49
- 2026Do I Really Know? Learning Factual Self-Verification for Hallucination Reductioncited by 2
- 2026Micro-Macro Retrieval: Reducing Long-Form Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Look Before You Leap: Factual Decoding with Internal Attribution Signalscited by 0
- 2026Look Before You Leap: Factual Decoding with Internal Attribution Signals14 Sep 2026
- 2026Micro-Macro Retrieval: Reducing Long-Form Hallucination in Large Language Models10 Apr 2026
- 2026Do I Really Know? Learning Factual Self-Verification for Hallucination Reduction2 Feb 2026
- 2025Large Language Models Hallucination: A Comprehensive Survey5 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Token-Guard: Towards Token-Level Hallucination Control via Self-Checking Decoding
- 2025Generate, but Verify: Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models with Retrospective Resampling
- 2026Listen to the Layers: Mitigating Hallucinations with Inter-Layer Disagreement
- 2025Confidence-Aware Routing for Large Language Model Reliability Enhancement: A Multi-Signal Approach to Pre-Generation Hallucination Mitigation
- 2025Decoding Memories: An Efficient Pipeline for Self-Consistency Hallucination Detection
- 2025Active Layer-Contrastive Decoding Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Model Generation
- 2026From Architecture to Output: Structural Origins of Hallucination in Large Language Models and the Amplifying Role of Data
- 2023Ever: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models through Real-Time Verification and Rectification