mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Elliptic Loss Regularization

arXiv 2503.02138 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Regularizing neural networks is important for anticipating model behavior in regions of the data space that are not well represented. In this work, we propose a regularization technique for enforcing a level of smoothness in the mapping between the data input space and the loss value. We specify the level of regularity by requiring that the loss of the network satisfies an elliptic operator over the data domain. To do this, we modify the usual empirical risk minimization objective such that we instead minimize a new objective that satisfies an elliptic operator over points within the domain. This allows us to use existing theory on elliptic operators to anticipate the behavior of the error for points outside the training set. We propose a tractable computational method that approximates the behavior of the elliptic operator while being computationally efficient. Finally, we analyze the properties of the proposed regularization to understand the performance on common problems of distribution shift and group imbalance. Numerical experiments confirm the utility of the proposed regularization technique.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.

Builds on

27 of 37 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  4. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  5. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  6. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  7. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,194
  8. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
  9. 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 682
  10. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  11. 2021Gradient Matching for Domain Generalizationcited by 258
  12. 2019Adversarial Domain Adaptation with Domain Mixupcited by 250
15 more
  1. 2021Invariance Principle Meets Information Bottleneck for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 220
  2. 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
  3. 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
  4. 2020Large-Scale Methods for Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 179
  5. 2020On Mixup Regularizationcited by 82
  6. 2020Regularizing Deep Networks with Semantic Data Augmentationcited by 73
  7. 2022The Effects of Regularization and Data Augmentation are Class Dependentcited by 67
  8. 2018Data augmentation instead of explicit regularizationcited by 62
  9. 2022C-Mixup: Improving Generalization in Regressioncited by 57
  10. 2021DORO: Distributional and Outlier Robust Optimizationcited by 54
  11. 2022How Much Data Are Augmentations Worth? An Investigation into Scaling Laws, Invariance, and Implicit Regularizationcited by 40
  12. 2022UMIX: Improving Importance Weighting for Subpopulation Shift via Uncertainty-Aware Mixupcited by 34
  13. 2022Sample Efficiency of Data Augmentation Consistency Regularizationcited by 28
  14. 2022MixupE: Understanding and Improving Mixup from Directional Derivative Perspectivecited by 6
  15. 2025Parabolic Continual Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.