Proper decision trees: An axiomatic framework for solving optimal decision tree problems with arbitrary splitting rules
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present an axiomatic framework for analyzing the algorithmic properties of decision trees. This framework supports the classification of decision tree problems through structural and ancestral constraints within a rigorous mathematical foundation. The central focus of this paper is a special class of decision tree problems-which we term proper decision trees-due to their versatility and effectiveness. In terms of versatility, this class subsumes several well-known data structures, including binary space partitioning trees, K-D trees, and machine learning decision tree models. Regarding effectiveness, we prove that only proper decision trees can be uniquely characterized as K-permutations, whereas typical non-proper decision trees correspond to binary-labeled decision trees with substantially greater complexity. Using this formal characterization, we develop a generic algorithmic approach for solving optimal decision tree problems over arbitrary splitting rules and objective functions for proper decision trees. We constructively derive a generic dynamic programming recursion for solving these problems exactly. However, we show that memoization is generally impractical in terms of space complexity, as both datasets and subtrees must be stored. This result contradicts claims in the literature that suggest a trade-off between memoizing datasets and subtrees. Our framework further accommodates constraints such as tree depth and leaf size, and can be accelerated using techniques such as thinning. Finally, we extend our analysis to several non-proper decision trees, including the commonly studied decision tree over binary feature data, the binary search tree, and the tree structure arising in the matrix chain multiplication problem. We demonstrate how these problems can be solved by appropriately modifying or discarding certain axioms.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2025.
Builds on
9 of 47 references.
References · 9
- 2019Optimal Sparse Decision Treescited by 104
- 2020Generalized and Scalable Optimal Sparse Decision Treescited by 98
- 2020MurTree: Optimal Classification Trees via Dynamic Programming and Searchcited by 61
- 2020A Scalable MIP-based Method for Learning Optimal Multivariate Decision Treescited by 22
- 2022Quant-BnB: A Scalable Branch-and-Bound Method for Optimal Decision Trees with Continuous Featurescited by 19
- 2019Top-down induction of decision trees: rigorous guarantees and inherent limitationscited by 17
- 2016Optimal Generalized Decision Trees via Integer Programmingcited by 7
- 2019The Binary Space Partitioning-Tree Processcited by 5
- 2021Dynamic programming by polymorphic semiring algebraic shortcut fusioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Optimal hypersurface decision treescited by 0
- 2025Optimal hypersurface decision trees15 Sep 2025