mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Network Security Management in Water Systems using FM-based Attack Attribution

arXiv 2503.01229 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.CR cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Water systems are vital components of modern infrastructure, yet they are increasingly susceptible to sophisticated cyber attacks with potentially dire consequences on public health and safety. While state-of-the-art machine learning techniques effectively detect anomalies, contemporary model-agnostic attack attribution methods using LIME, SHAP, and LEMNA are deemed impractical for large-scale, interdependent water systems. This is due to the intricate interconnectivity and dynamic interactions that define these complex environments. Such methods primarily emphasize individual feature importance while falling short of addressing the crucial sensor-actuator interactions in water systems, which limits their effectiveness in identifying root cause attacks. To this end, we propose a novel model-agnostic Factorization Machines (FM)-based approach that capitalizes on water system sensor-actuator interactions to provide granular explanations and attributions for cyber attacks. For instance, an anomaly in an actuator pump activity can be attributed to a top root cause attack candidates, a list of water pressure sensors, which is derived from the underlying linear and quadratic effects captured by our approach. We validate our method using two real-world water system specific datasets, SWaT and WADI, demonstrating its superior performance over traditional attribution methods. In multi-feature cyber attack scenarios involving intricate sensor-actuator interactions, our FM-based attack attribution method effectively ranks attack root causes, achieving approximately 20% average improvement over SHAP and LEMNA.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2025.

Builds on

9 of 44 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  5. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  6. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  7. 2019Explainable AI for Trees: From Local Explanations to Global Understandingcited by 64
  8. 2022The Role of Machine Learning in Cybersecuritycited by 21
  9. 2022Explainable Anomaly Detection for Industrial Control System Cybersecuritycited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.