Factorized Deep Q-Network for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Victim Tagging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) are a growing concern, characterized by complexity and uncertainty that demand adaptive decision-making strategies. The victim tagging step in the emergency medical response must be completed quickly and is crucial for providing information to guide subsequent time-constrained response actions. In this paper, we present a mathematical formulation of multi-agent victim tagging to minimize the time it takes for responders to tag all victims. Five distributed heuristics are formulated and evaluated with simulation experiments. The heuristics considered are on-the go, practical solutions that represent varying levels of situational uncertainty in the form of global or local communication capabilities, showcasing practical constraints. We further investigate the performance of a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) strategy, factorized deep Q-network (FDQN), to minimize victim tagging time as compared to baseline heuristics. Extensive simulations demonstrate that between the heuristics, methods with local communication are more efficient for adaptive victim tagging, specifically choosing the nearest victim with the option to replan. Analyzing all experiments, we find that our FDQN approach outperforms heuristics in smaller-scale scenarios, while heuristics excel in more complex scenarios. Our experiments contain diverse complexities that explore the upper limits of MARL capabilities for real-world applications and reveal key insights.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2025.
Builds on
9 of 38 references.
References · 9
- 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 503
- 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 485
- 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 379
- 2018A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 177
- 2019A Review of Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 147
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Agent Systems: A Review of Challenges, Solutions and Applicationscited by 127
- 2020Qatten: A General Framework for Cooperative Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
- 2018Coordinating Disaster Emergency Response with Heuristic Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2024Advances in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning: Persistent Autonomy and Robot Learning Lab Report 2024cited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Using AI to Optimize Patient Transfer and Resource Utilization During Mass-Casualty Incidents: A Simulation Platform
- 2024Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Joint Police Patrol and Dispatch
- 2024Stochastic Dynamic Network Utility Maximization with Application to Disaster Response ↗
- 2024Mixed Q-Functionals: Advancing Value-Based Methods in Cooperative MARL with Continuous Action Domains
- 2024Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Hierarchical Coordination for Emergency Responder Stationing
- 2025Can LLM Agents Solve Collaborative Tasks? A Study on Urgency-Aware Planning and Coordination
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Multi-Agent Cooperative Decision-Making: Scenarios, Approaches, Challenges and Perspectives
- 2025Graph Neural Networks, Deep Reinforcement Learning and Probabilistic Topic Modeling for Strategic Multiagent Settings