A database to support the evaluation of gender biases in GPT-4o output
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) involves ethical risks for users and societies. A prominent ethical risk of LLMs is the generation of unfair language output that reinforces or exacerbates harm for members of disadvantaged social groups through gender biases (Weidinger et al., 2022; Bender et al., 2021; Kotek et al., 2023). Hence, the evaluation of the fairness of LLM outputs with respect to such biases is a topic of rising interest. To advance research in this field, promote discourse on suitable normative bases and evaluation methodologies, and enhance the reproducibility of related studies, we propose a novel approach to database construction. This approach enables the assessment of gender-related biases in LLM-generated language beyond merely evaluating their degree of neutralization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2025.
Builds on
2 of 15 references.
References · 2
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
Built on by
Not cited yet.