mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Obtaining Example-Based Explanations from Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2502.19768 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most techniques for explainable machine learning focus on feature attribution, i.e., values are assigned to the features such that their sum equals the prediction. Example attribution is another form of explanation that assigns weights to the training examples, such that their scalar product with the labels equals the prediction. The latter may provide valuable complementary information to feature attribution, in particular in cases where the features are not easily interpretable. Current example-based explanation techniques have targeted a few model types only, such as k-nearest neighbors and random forests. In this work, a technique for obtaining example-based explanations from deep neural networks (EBE-DNN) is proposed. The basic idea is to use the deep neural network to obtain an embedding, which is employed by a k-nearest neighbor classifier to form a prediction; the example attribution can hence straightforwardly be derived from the latter. Results from an empirical investigation show that EBE-DNN can provide highly concentrated example attributions, i.e., the predictions can be explained with few training examples, without reducing accuracy compared to the original deep neural network. Another important finding from the empirical investigation is that the choice of layer to use for the embeddings may have a large impact on the resulting accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2025.

Builds on

11 of 21 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  6. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  7. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  8. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  9. 2018Deep k-Nearest Neighbors: Towards Confident, Interpretable and Robust Deep Learningcited by 207
  10. 2023Natural Example-Based Explainability: a Surveycited by 13
  11. 2023Example-Based Explanations of Random Forest Predictionscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.