mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Validating the predictions of mathematical models describing tumor growth and treatment response

arXiv 2502.19333 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2025q-bio.TO cs.CE q-bio.CBcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite advances in methods to interrogate tumor biology, the observational and population-based approach of classical cancer research and clinical oncology does not enable anticipation of tumor outcomes to hasten the discovery of cancer mechanisms and personalize disease management. To address these limitations, individualized cancer forecasts have been shown to predict tumor growth and therapeutic response, inform treatment optimization, and guide experimental efforts. These predictions are obtained via computer simulations of mathematical models that are constrained with data from a patient's cancer and experiments. This book chapter addresses the validation of these mathematical models to forecast tumor growth and treatment response. We start with an overview of mathematical modeling frameworks, model selection techniques, and fundamental metrics. We then describe the usual strategies employed to validate cancer forecasts in preclinical and clinical scenarios. Finally, we discuss existing barriers in validating these predictions along with potential strategies to address them.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.