Tokenized SAEs: Disentangling SAE Reconstructions
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse auto-encoders (SAEs) have become a prevalent tool for interpreting language models' inner workings. However, it is unknown how tightly SAE features correspond to computationally important directions in the model. This work empirically shows that many RES-JB SAE features predominantly correspond to simple input statistics. We hypothesize this is caused by a large class imbalance in training data combined with a lack of complex error signals. To reduce this behavior, we propose a method that disentangles token reconstruction from feature reconstruction. This improvement is achieved by introducing a per-token bias, which provides an enhanced baseline for interesting reconstruction. As a result, significantly more interesting features and improved reconstruction in sparse regimes are learned.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 4 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2025.
Builds on
4 of 11 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable?
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders
- 2024Investigating Sensitive Directions in GPT-2: An Improved Baseline and Comparative Analysis of SAEs
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability
- 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedy
- 2025Revisiting End-To-End Sparse Autoencoder Training: A Short Finetune Is All You Need
- 2026Diminishing Returns of Data in Sparse Autoencoders: Functional Behavior does not Guarantee Feature Reproducibility