mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sentiment analysis of texts from social networks based on machine learning methods for monitoring public sentiment

arXiv 2502.17143 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A sentiment analysis system powered by machine learning was created in this study to improve real-time social network public opinion monitoring. For sophisticated sentiment identification, the suggested approach combines cutting-edge transformer-based architectures (DistilBERT, RoBERTa) with traditional machine learning models (Logistic Regression, SVM, Naive Bayes). The system achieved an accuracy of up to 80-85% using transformer models in real-world scenarios after being tested using both deep learning techniques and standard machine learning processes on annotated social media datasets. According to experimental results, deep learning models perform noticeably better than lexicon-based and conventional rule-based classifiers, lowering misclassification rates and enhancing the ability to recognize nuances like sarcasm. According to feature importance analysis, context tokens, sentiment-bearing keywords, and part-of-speech structure are essential for precise categorization. The findings confirm that AI-driven sentiment frameworks can provide a more adaptive and efficient approach to modern sentiment challenges. Despite the system's impressive performance, issues with computing overhead, data quality, and domain-specific terminology still exist. In order to monitor opinions on a broad scale, future research will investigate improving computing performance, extending coverage to various languages, and integrating real-time streaming APIs. The results demonstrate that governments, corporations, and social researchers looking for more in-depth understanding of public mood on digital platforms can find a reliable and adaptable answer in AI-powered sentiment analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2025.

Builds on

3 of 13 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.