Toward Dependency Dynamics in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Traffic Signal Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) emerges as a promising data-driven approach for adaptive traffic signal control (ATSC) in complex urban traffic networks, with deep neural networks substantially augmenting its learning capabilities. However, centralized RL becomes impractical for ATSC involving multiple agents due to the exceedingly high dimensionality of the joint action space. Multi-agent RL (MARL) mitigates this scalability issue by decentralizing control to local RL agents. Nevertheless, this decentralized method introduces new challenges: the environment becomes partially observable from the perspective of each local agent due to constrained inter-agent communication. Both centralized RL and MARL exhibit distinct strengths and weaknesses, particularly under heavy intersectional traffic conditions. In this paper, we justify that MARL can achieve the optimal global Q-value by separating into multiple IRL (Independent Reinforcement Learning) processes when no spill-back congestion occurs (no agent dependency) among agents (intersections). In the presence of spill-back congestion (with agent dependency), the maximum global Q-value can be achieved by using centralized RL. Building upon the conclusions, we propose a novel Dynamic Parameter Update Strategy for Deep Q-Network (DQN-DPUS), which updates the weights and bias based on the dependency dynamics among agents, i.e. updating only the diagonal sub-matrices for the scenario without spill-back congestion. We validate the DQN-DPUS in a simple network with two intersections under varying traffic, and show that the proposed strategy can speed up the convergence rate without sacrificing optimal exploration. The results corroborate our theoretical findings, demonstrating the efficacy of DQN-DPUS in optimizing traffic signal control.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2025.
Builds on
13 of 43 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
- 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
- 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 355
- 2019Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Large-scale Traffic Signal Controlcited by 159
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Surveycited by 94
- 2019Large-Scale Traffic Signal Control Using a Novel Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
- 2021Learning dynamic and hierarchical traffic spatiotemporal features with Transformercited by 26
- 2022Two-layer adaptive signal control framework for large-scale dynamically-congested networks: Combining efficient Max Pressure with Perimeter Controlcited by 12
- 2020DRLE: Decentralized Reinforcement Learning at the Edge for Traffic Light Control in the IoVcited by 7
- 2023Large-Scale Traffic Signal Control Using Constrained Network Partition and Adaptive Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.