Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Deep Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We establish the asymptotic implicit bias of gradient descent (GD) for generic non-homogeneous deep networks under exponential loss. Specifically, we characterize three key properties of GD iterates starting from a sufficiently small empirical risk, where the threshold is determined by a measure of the network's non-homogeneity. First, we show that a normalized margin induced by the GD iterates increases nearly monotonically. Second, we prove that while the norm of the GD iterates diverges to infinity, the iterates themselves converge in direction. Finally, we establish that this directional limit satisfies the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions of a margin maximization problem. Prior works on implicit bias have focused exclusively on homogeneous networks; in contrast, our results apply to a broad class of non-homogeneous networks satisfying a mild near-homogeneity condition. In particular, our results apply to networks with residual connections and non-homogeneous activation functions, thereby resolving an open problem posed by Ji and Telgarsky (2020).
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.
9 papers.
- 2026The Implicit Bias of Adam and Muon on Smooth Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2026Understanding and inverse design of implicit bias in stochastic learning: a geometric perspectivecited by 3
- 2025Diagonalizing the Softmax: Hadamard Initialization for Tractable Cross-Entropy Dynamicscited by 2
- 2026Data Reconstruction: Identifiability and Optimization with Sample Splittingcited by 1
- 2025Directional Convergence, Benign Overfitting of Gradient Descent in leaky ReLU two-layer Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026On the implicit regularization of Langevin dynamics with projected noisecited by 0
- 2026Hard labels sampled from sparse targets mislead rotation invariant algorithmscited by 0
- 2026Implicit Bias of Mirror Flow in Homogeneous Neural Networks: Sparse and Dense Feature Learningcited by 0
- 2026The Implicit Bias of Depth: From Neural Collapse to Softmax Codescited by 0
- 2026The Implicit Bias of Depth: From Neural Collapse to Softmax Codes21 May 2026
- 2026Implicit Bias of Mirror Flow in Homogeneous Neural Networks: Sparse and Dense Feature Learning19 May 2026
- 2026Hard labels sampled from sparse targets mislead rotation invariant algorithms21 Mar 2026
- 2026The Implicit Bias of Adam and Muon on Smooth Homogeneous Neural Networks18 Feb 2026
- 2026On the implicit regularization of Langevin dynamics with projected noise12 Feb 2026
- 2026Data Reconstruction: Identifiability and Optimization with Sample Splitting9 Feb 2026
- 2026Understanding and inverse design of implicit bias in stochastic learning: a geometric perspective10 Jan 2026
- 2025Diagonalizing the Softmax: Hadamard Initialization for Tractable Cross-Entropy Dynamics3 Dec 2025
- 2025Directional Convergence, Benign Overfitting of Gradient Descent in leaky ReLU two-layer Neural Networks22 May 2025