Time Warp: The Gap Between Developers' Ideal vs Actual Workweeks in an AI-Driven Era
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Software developers balance a variety of different tasks in a workweek, yet the allocation of time often differs from what they consider ideal. Identifying and addressing these deviations is crucial for organizations aiming to enhance the productivity and well-being of the developers. In this paper, we present the findings from a survey of 484 software developers at Microsoft, which aims to identify the key differences between how developers would like to allocate their time during an ideal workweek versus their actual workweek. Our analysis reveals significant deviations between a developer's ideal workweek and their actual workweek, with a clear correlation: as the gap between these two workweeks widens, we observe a decline in both productivity and satisfaction. By examining these deviations in specific activities, we assess their direct impact on the developers' satisfaction and productivity. Additionally, given the growing adoption of AI tools in software engineering, both in the industry and academia, we identify specific tasks and areas that could be strong candidates for automation. In this paper, we make three key contributions: 1) We quantify the impact of workweek deviations on developer productivity and satisfaction 2) We identify individual tasks that disproportionately affect satisfaction and productivity 3) We provide actual data-driven insights to guide future AI automation efforts in software engineering, aligning them with the developers' requirements and ideal workflows for maximizing their productivity and satisfaction.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2025.
Builds on
7 of 39 references.
References · 7
- 2023The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilotcited by 274
- 2024Transforming Software Development with Generative AI: Empirical Insights on Collaboration and Workflowcited by 6
- 2017What happens when software developers are (un)happycited by 4
- 2020Mind the Gap: On the Relationship Between Automatically Measured and Self-Reported Productivitycited by 3
- 2015Happy software developers solve problems better: psychological measurements in empirical software engineeringcited by 2
- 2024Does Co-Development with AI Assistants Lead to More Maintainable Code? A Registered Reportcited by 2
- 2021The Daily Life of Software Engineers during the COVID-19 Pandemiccited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2026Are We All Using Agents the Same Way? An Empirical Study of Core and Peripheral Developers Use of Coding Agentscited by 3
- 2025Liberating Logic in the Age of AI: Going Beyond Programming with Computational Thinkingcited by 2
- 2025The SPACE of AI: Real-World Lessons on AI's Impact on Developerscited by 1
- 2026More Is Different: Toward a Theory of Emergence in AI-Native Software Ecosystemscited by 1
- 2026More Is Different: Toward a Theory of Emergence in AI-Native Software Ecosystems20 Apr 2026
- 2026Are We All Using Agents the Same Way? An Empirical Study of Core and Peripheral Developers Use of Coding Agents27 Jan 2026
- 2025Liberating Logic in the Age of AI: Going Beyond Programming with Computational Thinking21 Nov 2025
- 2025The SPACE of AI: Real-World Lessons on AI's Impact on Developers31 Jul 2025