Measuring AI agent autonomy: Towards a scalable approach with code inspection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI agents are AI systems that can achieve complex goals autonomously. Assessing the level of agent autonomy is crucial for understanding both their potential benefits and risks. Current assessments of autonomy often focus on specific risks and rely on run-time evaluations -- observations of agent actions during operation. We introduce a code-based assessment of autonomy that eliminates the need to run an AI agent to perform specific tasks, thereby reducing the costs and risks associated with run-time evaluations. Using this code-based framework, the orchestration code used to run an AI agent can be scored according to a taxonomy that assesses attributes of autonomy: impact and oversight. We demonstrate this approach with the AutoGen framework and select applications.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2025.
Builds on
9 of 25 references.
References · 9
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2024Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Securitycited by 257
- 2024AI Agents That Mattercited by 199
- 2023Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systemscited by 134
- 2024The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistantscited by 103
- 2023Evaluating Language-Model Agents on Realistic Autonomous Taskscited by 94
- 2024Visibility into AI Agentscited by 77
- 2023AI capabilities can be significantly improved without expensive retrainingcited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 10.
10 papers.
- 2025Levels of Autonomy for AI Agentscited by 45
- 2025A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agentscited by 28
- 2025AgentMisalignment: Measuring the Propensity for Misaligned Behaviour in LLM-Based Agentscited by 22
- 2025A Call for Collaborative Intelligence: Why Human-Agent Systems Should Precede AI Autonomycited by 9
- 2025Distributional AGI Safetycited by 8
- 2025Measuring Data Science Automation: A Survey of Evaluation Tools for AI Assistants and Agentscited by 4
- 2025Exploring Consciousness in LLMs: A Systematic Survey of Theories, Implementations, and Frontier Riskscited by 3
- 2025Regulating the Agency of LLM-based Agentscited by 1
- 2025Societal Capacity Assessment Framework: Measuring Resilience to Inform Advanced AI Risk Managementcited by 1
- 2025AgentSLA : Towards a Service Level Agreement for AI Agentscited by 1
- 2025Distributional AGI Safety18 Dec 2025
- 2025AgentSLA : Towards a Service Level Agreement for AI Agents4 Nov 2025
- 2025Societal Capacity Assessment Framework: Measuring Resilience to Inform Advanced AI Risk Management26 Sep 2025
- 2025Regulating the Agency of LLM-based Agents25 Sep 2025
- 2025A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents30 Jun 2025
- 2025Levels of Autonomy for AI Agents14 Jun 2025
- 2025A Call for Collaborative Intelligence: Why Human-Agent Systems Should Precede AI Autonomy11 Jun 2025
- 2025Measuring Data Science Automation: A Survey of Evaluation Tools for AI Assistants and Agents10 Jun 2025
- 2025AgentMisalignment: Measuring the Propensity for Misaligned Behaviour in LLM-Based Agents4 Jun 2025
- 2025Exploring Consciousness in LLMs: A Systematic Survey of Theories, Implementations, and Frontier Risks26 May 2025