Data-Constrained Synthesis of Training Data for De-Identification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many sensitive domains -- such as the clinical domain -- lack widely available datasets due to privacy risks. The increasing generative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have made synthetic datasets a viable path forward. In this study, we domain-adapt LLMs to the clinical domain and generate synthetic clinical texts that are machine-annotated with tags for personally identifiable information using capable encoder-based NER models. The synthetic corpora are then used to train synthetic NER models. The results show that training NER models using synthetic corpora incurs only a small drop in predictive performance. The limits of this process are investigated in a systematic ablation study -- using both Swedish and Spanish data. Our analysis shows that smaller datasets can be sufficient for domain-adapting LLMs for data synthesis. Instead, the effectiveness of this process is almost entirely contingent on the performance of the machine-annotating NER models trained using the original data.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.
Builds on
8 of 36 references.
References · 8
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 195
- 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 95
- 2020Playing with Words at the National Library of Sweden -- Making a Swedish BERTcited by 35
- 2023DP-NMT: Scalable Differentially-Private Machine Translationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.