On the logical skills of large language models: evaluations using arbitrarily complex first-order logic problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a method of generating first-order logic statements whose complexity can be controlled along multiple dimensions. We use this method to automatically create several datasets consisting of questions asking for the truth or falsity of first-order logic statements in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. While the resolution of these questions does not require any knowledge beyond basic notation of first-order logic and set theory, it does require a degree of planning and logical reasoning, which can be controlled up to arbitrarily high difficulty by the complexity of the generated statements. Furthermore, we do extensive evaluations of the performance of various large language models, including recent models such as DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI's o3-mini, on these datasets. All of the datasets along with the code used for generating them, as well as all data from the evaluations is publicly available at https://github.com/bkuckuck/logical-skills-of-llms.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Do Large Language Models Excel in Complex Logical Reasoning with Formal Language?
- 2026QMFOL: Benchmarking Large Language Model Reasoning via Quantifiable Monadic First-Order Logic Test Case Generation
- 2025Can Large Language Models Learn Formal Logic? A Data-Driven Training and Evaluation Framework
- 2024LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models
- 2026LogicSkills: A Structured Benchmark for Formal Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2024CLR-Fact: Evaluating the Complex Logical Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models over Factual Knowledge
- 2025AutoLogi: Automated Generation of Logic Puzzles for Evaluating Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models
- 2025Large Language Models Meet Symbolic Provers for Logical Reasoning Evaluation