Benchmarking of Different YOLO Models for CAPTCHAs Detection and Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper provides an analysis and comparison of the YOLOv5, YOLOv8 and YOLOv10 models for webpage CAPTCHAs detection using the datasets collected from the web and darknet as well as synthetized data of webpages. The study examines the nano (n), small (s), and medium (m) variants of YOLO architectures and use metrics such as Precision, Recall, F1 score, mAP@50 and inference speed to determine the real-life utility. Additionally, the possibility of tuning the trained model to detect new CAPTCHA patterns efficiently was examined as it is a crucial part of real-life applications. The image slicing method was proposed as a way to improve the metrics of detection on oversized input images which can be a common scenario in webpages analysis. Models in version nano achieved the best results in terms of speed, while more complexed architectures scored better in terms of other metrics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2025.
Builds on
5 of 34 references.
References · 5
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 515
- 2024Breaking reCAPTCHAv2cited by 13
- 2020Deep-CAPTCHA: a deep learning based CAPTCHA solver for vulnerability assessmentcited by 11
- 2023Vulnerability analysis of captcha using Deep learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.