BeamLoRA: Beam-Constraint Low-Rank Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Due to the demand for efficient fine-tuning of large language models, Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has been widely adopted as one of the most effective parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods. Nevertheless, while LoRA improves efficiency, there remains room for improvement in accuracy. Herein, we adopt a novel perspective to assess the characteristics of LoRA ranks. The results reveal that different ranks within the LoRA modules not only exhibit varying levels of importance but also evolve dynamically throughout the fine-tuning process, which may limit the performance of LoRA. Based on these findings, we propose BeamLoRA, which conceptualizes each LoRA module as a beam where each rank naturally corresponds to a potential sub-solution, and the fine-tuning process becomes a search for the optimal sub-solution combination. BeamLoRA dynamically eliminates underperforming sub-solutions while expanding the parameter space for promising ones, enhancing performance with a fixed rank. Extensive experiments across three base models and 12 datasets spanning math reasoning, code generation, and commonsense reasoning demonstrate that BeamLoRA consistently enhances the performance of LoRA, surpassing the other baseline methods.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2025.
Builds on
22 of 37 references.
References · 22
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
10 more
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
- 2015Net2Net: Accelerating Learning via Knowledge Transfercited by 245
- 2024OpenCodeInterpreter: Integrating Code Generation with Execution and Refinementcited by 242
- 2023ReLoRA: High-Rank Training Through Low-Rank Updatescited by 200
- 2022The Optimal BERT Surgeon: Scalable and Accurate Second-Order Pruning for Large Language Modelscited by 115
- 2024Scaling Smart: Accelerating Large Language Model Pre-training with Small Model Initializationcited by 29
- 2024Light-PEFT: Lightening Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning via Early Pruningcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026TLoRA: Task-aware Low Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
- 2024LoRA-Pro: Are Low-Rank Adapters Properly Optimized?
- 2025LoRA Is Slower Than You Think
- 2025RaSA: Rank-Sharing Low-Rank Adaptation
- 2025Dual LoRA: Enhancing LoRA with Magnitude and Direction Updates
- 2024LoRA-XS: Low-Rank Adaptation with Extremely Small Number of Parameters
- 2025RefLoRA: Refactored Low-Rank Adaptation for Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Models
- 2025LoRA-One: One-Step Full Gradient Could Suffice for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models, Provably and Efficiently