mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Learning Under Density Shift in Incremental Settings Using Cram'er-Rao-Based Regularization

arXiv 2502.12949 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The continuous surge in data volume and velocity is often dealt with using data orchestration and distributed processing approaches, abstracting away the machine learning challenges that exist at the algorithmic level. With growing interest in automating the learning loop, training with data that arrive in a sequence rather than in the classical in-memory training data form will face a machine learning challenge because of evolving feature distributions across batches of training data biasing the cross-validation step (citesugiyama2012machine). This work takes a distributed density estimation angle to the problem where data are temporally distributed. It processes data in batches and allows a neural network to treat a batch as training data. The method accumulates knowledge about the data density via posterior probability absorption using the Fisher Information Matrix, which contains information about the local optimization gradients for the batch. This is then used as a regularizer for the loss in the following batch, and therefore the density estimate for the entire dataset constructively gets more robust to the non-iid distribution shift. This needs the presence of a pair of batches in memory at a time, so the space cost is not a function of the size of the complete, distributed dataset. We proposed a novel regularization-based approach Covariate Shift Correction C2A that leverages Fisher information and Kullback-Leibler divergence to adapt to both natural and sequential covariate shift caused by dataset fragmentation. C2A achieves 19% accuracy at maximum against state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.

Builds on

22 of 70 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  4. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  5. 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 711
  6. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  7. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 415
  8. 2021Data-Free Knowledge Distillation for Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 380
  9. 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
  10. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
  11. 2013Revisiting Natural Gradient for Deep Networkscited by 157
  12. 2020The Effect of Natural Distribution Shift on Question Answering Modelscited by 104
10 more
  1. 2020Rethinking Importance Weighting for Deep Learning under Distribution Shiftcited by 92
  2. 2021Test-time Batch Statistics Calibration for Covariate Shiftcited by 50
  3. 2020Calibrated Prediction with Covariate Shift via Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 43
  4. 2019Testing randomnesscited by 32
  5. 2020Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shiftcited by 19
  6. 2023Adapting to Continuous Covariate Shift via Online Density Ratio Estimationcited by 15
  7. 2020Testing for concept shift onlinecited by 14
  8. 2022FL Games: A Federated Learning Framework for Distribution Shiftscited by 14
  9. 2021Training on Test Data with Bayesian Adaptation for Covariate Shiftcited by 8
  10. 2025Causal Covariate Shift Correction using Fisher information penaltycited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.