mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Green LIME: Improving AI Explainability through Design of Experiments

arXiv 2502.12753 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2025stat.ML cs.LG stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In artificial intelligence (AI), the complexity of many models and processes surpasses human understanding, making it challenging to determine why a specific prediction is made. This lack of transparency is particularly problematic in critical fields like healthcare, where trust in a model's predictions is paramount. As a result, the explainability of machine learning (ML) and other complex models has become a key area of focus. Efforts to improve model explainability often involve experimenting with AI systems and approximating their behavior through interpretable surrogate mechanisms. However, these procedures can be resource-intensive. Optimal design of experiments, which seeks to maximize the information obtained from a limited number of observations, offers promising methods for improving the efficiency of these explainability techniques. To demonstrate this potential, we explore Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), a widely used method introduced by Ribeiro et al. (2016). LIME provides explanations by generating new data points near the instance of interest and passing them through the model. While effective, this process can be computationally expensive, especially when predictions are costly or require many samples. LIME is highly versatile and can be applied to a wide range of models and datasets. In this work, we focus on models involving tabular data, regression tasks, and linear models as interpretable local approximations. By utilizing optimal design of experiments' techniques, we reduce the number of function evaluations of the complex model, thereby reducing the computational effort of LIME by a significant amount. We consider this modified version of LIME to be energy-efficient or "green".

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.

Builds on

8 of 22 references.

References · 8

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
  2. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 442
  3. 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
  4. 2021S-LIME: Stabilized-LIME for Model Explanationcited by 52
  5. 2024Optimal experimental design: Formulations and computationscited by 45
  6. 2019ALIME: Autoencoder Based Approach for Local Interpretabilitycited by 41
  7. 2020Statistical stability indices for LIME: obtaining reliable explanations for Machine Learning modelscited by 40
  8. 2020OptiLIME: Optimized LIME Explanations for Diagnostic Computer Algorithmscited by 30

Built on by

Not cited yet.