Can LLMs Extract Frame-Semantic Arguments?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Frame-semantic parsing is a critical task in natural language understanding, yet the ability of large language models (LLMs) to extract frame-semantic arguments remains underexplored. This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs on frame-semantic argument identification, analyzing the impact of input representation formats, model architectures, and generalization to unseen and out-of-domain samples. Our experiments, spanning models from 0.5B to 78B parameters, reveal that JSON-based representations significantly enhance performance, and while larger models generally perform better, smaller models can achieve competitive results through fine-tuning. We also introduce a novel approach to frame identification leveraging predicted frame elements, achieving state-of-the-art performance on ambiguous targets. Despite strong generalization capabilities, our analysis finds that LLMs still struggle with out-of-domain data.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.
Builds on
22 of 40 references.
References · 22
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 385
- 2023MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoningcited by 201
- 2023Not All Languages Are Created Equal in LLMs: Improving Multilingual Capability by Cross-Lingual-Thought Promptingcited by 165
- 2024Let Me Speak Freely? A Study on the Impact of Format Restrictions on Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 96
10 more
- 2017Frame-Semantic Parsing with Softmax-Margin Segmental RNNs and a Syntactic Scaffoldcited by 33
- 2024Better to Ask in English: Evaluation of Large Language Models on English, Low-resource and Cross-Lingual Settingscited by 14
- 2022A Double-Graph Based Framework for Frame Semantic Parsingcited by 10
- 2024Potential and Limitations of LLMs in Capturing Structured Semantics: A Case Study on SRLcited by 10
- 2023Coarse-to-Fine Dual Encoders are Better Frame Identification Learnerscited by 9
- 2024Output Format Biases in the Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Translationcited by 9
- 2020Encoding Syntactic Constituency Paths for Frame-Semantic Parsing with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 7
- 2021A Graph-Based Neural Model for End-to-End Frame Semantic Parsingcited by 7
- 2024Annotating FrameNet via Structure-Conditioned Language Generationcited by 2
- 2023Knowledge-augmented Frame Semantic Parsing with Hybrid Prompt-tuningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.