EDGE: Efficient Data Selection for LLM Agents via Guideline Effectiveness
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as AI agents. However, existing methods for enhancing LLM-agent abilities often lack a focus on data quality, leading to inefficiencies and suboptimal results in both fine-tuning and prompt engineering. To address this issue, we introduce EDGE, a novel approach for identifying informative samples without needing golden answers. We propose the Guideline Effectiveness (GE) metric, which selects challenging samples by measuring the impact of human-provided guidelines in multi-turn interaction tasks. A low GE score indicates that the human expertise required for a sample is missing from the guideline, making the sample more informative. By selecting samples with low GE scores, we can improve the efficiency and outcomes of both prompt engineering and fine-tuning processes for LLMs. Extensive experiments validate the performance of our method. Our method achieves competitive results on the HotpotQA and WebShop and datasets, requiring 75% and 50% less data, respectively, while outperforming existing methods. We also provide a fresh perspective on the data quality of LLM-agent fine-tuning.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 22 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.
Builds on
22 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2024AutoGuide: Automated Generation and Selection of Context-Aware Guidelines for Large Language Model Agents13 Mar
- 2024AMOR: A Recipe for Building Adaptable Modular Knowledge Agents Through Process Feedback2 Feb
- 2023AgentTuning: Enabling Generalized Agent Abilities for LLMs19 Oct
- 2023FireAct: Toward Language Agent Fine-tuning9 Oct
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents22 Aug
- 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners20 Aug
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug
Other references · 15
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,251
- 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,242
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
- 2023#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 109
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Coarse-to-Fine Grounded Memory for LLM Agent Planningcited by 18
- 2026LLM4Cov: Execution-Aware Agentic Learning for High-coverage Testbench Generationcited by 5
- 2026Revisiting Robustness for LLM Safety Alignment via Selective Geometry Controlcited by 4
- 2026When the Strongest Teacher Is Not the Best Teacher: Student-Centric Answer Selectioncited by 1
- 2026When the Strongest Teacher Is Not the Best Teacher: Student-Centric Answer Selection26 May 2026
- 2026LLM4Cov: Execution-Aware Agentic Learning for High-coverage Testbench Generation18 Feb 2026
- 2026Revisiting Robustness for LLM Safety Alignment via Selective Geometry Control7 Feb 2026
- 2025Coarse-to-Fine Grounded Memory for LLM Agent Planning21 Aug 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025GuideBench: Benchmarking Domain-Oriented Guideline Following for LLM Agents
- 2025IDA-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Interactive Guided Data Analysis
- 2025Exploring Expert Failures Improves LLM Agent Tuning
- 2026EvalBuilder: Can LLMs Build Efficient Benchmarks?
- 2024Tapilot-Crossing: Benchmarking and Evolving LLMs Towards Interactive Data Analysis Agents
- 2024The Ultimate Guide to Fine-Tuning LLMs from Basics to Breakthroughs: An Exhaustive Review of Technologies, Research, Best Practices, Applied Research Challenges and Opportunities
- 2025Leveraging LLMs as Meta-Judges: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evaluating LLM Judgments
- 2024Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction Tuning