mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Less is More: Compact Clue Selection for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation Reasoning

arXiv 2502.11811 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Current RAG retrievers are designed primarily for human readers, emphasizing complete, readable, and coherent paragraphs. However, Large Language Models (LLMs) benefit more from precise, compact, and well-structured input, which enhances reasoning quality and efficiency. Existing methods rely on reranking or summarization to identify key sentences, but may introduce semantic breaks and unfaithfulness. Thus, efficiently extracting and organizing answer-relevant clues from large-scale documents while reducing LLM reasoning costs remains challenging in RAG systems. Inspired by Occam's razor, we frame LLM-centric retrieval as MinMax optimization: maximizing the extraction of potential clues and reranking them for well-organization, while minimizing reasoning costs by truncating to the smallest sufficient set of clues. In this paper, we propose CompSelect, a compact clue selection mechanism for LLM-centric RAG, consisting of a clue extractor, a reranker, and a truncator. (1) The clue extractor first uses answer-containing sentences as fine-tuning targets, aiming to extract sufficient potential clues; (2) The reranker is trained to prioritize effective clues based on real LLM feedback; (3) The truncator uses the truncated text containing the minimum sufficient clues for answering the question as fine-tuning targets, thereby enabling efficient RAG reasoning. Experiments on three QA datasets demonstrate that CompSelect improves performance while reducing both total and online latency compared to a range of baseline methods. Further analysis also confirms its robustness to unreliable retrieval and generalization across different scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.

Builds on

9 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey18 Dec

Other references · 8

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,203
  3. 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
  4. 2024Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Surveycited by 83
  5. 2023Learning to Filter Context for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 82
  6. 2017Neural Models for Information Retrievalcited by 29
  7. 2024AdaComp: Extractive Context Compression with Adaptive Predictor for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 10
  8. 2024How Does Knowledge Selection Help Retrieval Augmented Generation?cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ClueAnchor: Clue-Anchored Knowledge Reasoning Exploration and Optimization for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  2. 2024Open-RAG: Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning with Open-Source Large Language Models
  3. 2024Eliciting Critical Reasoning in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models via Contrastive Explanations
  4. 2024JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Reranking
  5. 2024A Hybrid RAG System with Comprehensive Enhancement on Complex Reasoning
  6. 2025InfoGain-RAG: Boosting Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Document Information Gain-based Reranking and Filtering
  7. 2025Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs
  8. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directions