Be Cautious When Merging Unfamiliar LLMs: A Phishing Model Capable of Stealing Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model merging is a widespread technology in large language models (LLMs) that integrates multiple task-specific LLMs into a unified one, enabling the merged model to inherit the specialized capabilities of these LLMs. Most task-specific LLMs are sourced from open-source communities and have not undergone rigorous auditing, potentially imposing risks in model merging. This paper highlights an overlooked privacy risk: textitan unsafe model could compromise the privacy of other LLMs involved in the model merging. Specifically, we propose PhiMM, a privacy attack approach that trains a phishing model capable of stealing privacy using a crafted privacy phishing instruction dataset. Furthermore, we introduce a novel model cloaking method that mimics a specialized capability to conceal attack intent, luring users into merging the phishing model. Once victims merge the phishing model, the attacker can extract personally identifiable information (PII) or infer membership information (MI) by querying the merged model with the phishing instruction. Experimental results show that merging a phishing model increases the risk of privacy breaches. Compared to the results before merging, PII leakage increased by 3.9% and MI leakage increased by 17.4% on average. We release the code of PhiMM through a link.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.
Builds on
22 of 36 references.
References · 22
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
- 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 679
- 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 653
- 2023Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language Modelscited by 278
- 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 249
- 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Surveycited by 240
- 2022Are Large Pre-Trained Language Models Leaking Your Personal Information?cited by 195
- 2023Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibrationcited by 90
- 2021Multi-Task Learning in Natural Language Processing: An Overviewcited by 61
10 more
- 2023Chat Vector: A Simple Approach to Equip LLMs with Instruction Following and Model Alignment in New Languagescited by 52
- 2021Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting and Remembering in Continual Learning with Optimal Relevance Mappingcited by 47
- 2024Thinking LLMs: General Instruction Following with Thought Generationcited by 45
- 2024Model Merging and Safety Alignment: One Bad Model Spoils the Bunchcited by 41
- 2023The Janus Interface: How Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models Amplifies the Privacy Riskscited by 35
- 2024BadMerging: Backdoor Attacks Against Model Mergingcited by 32
- 2024Teach LLMs to Phish: Stealing Private Information from Language Modelscited by 29
- 2024Mitigating the Backdoor Effect for Multi-Task Model Merging via Safety-Aware Subspacecited by 14
- 2024Realistic Evaluation of Model Merging for Compositional Generalizationcited by 12
- 2024LoBAM: LoRA-Based Backdoor Attack on Model Mergingcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.