mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Which Retain Set Matters for LLM Unlearning? A Case Study on Entity Unlearning

arXiv 2502.11441 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 14

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) risk retaining unauthorized or sensitive information from their training data, which raises privacy concerns. LLM unlearning seeks to mitigate these risks by selectively removing specified data while maintaining overall model performance. However, most existing work focus on methods to achieve effective forgetting and does not provide a detailed analysis of the retain set, the portion of training data that is not targeted for removal. In this paper, we investigate the effects of unlearning on various subsets of the retain set through a case study on entity unlearning. We introduce the Syntactically Similar Neighbor Set, a group of queries that share similar syntactic structures with the data targeted for removal, and show that this subset suffers the greatest performance drop during unlearning. Moreover, when used for regularization, this set not only preserves performance on syntactically similar queries but also delivers comparable or improved results across other data subsets. Our results highlight that syntactic similarity is a critical factor, potentially more so than domain or entity relationships, in achieving effective and practical LLM unlearning.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 18 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.

Builds on

18 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024UnStar: Unlearning with Self-Taught Anti-Sample Reasoning for LLMs22 Oct
  2. 2024Revisiting Who's Harry Potter: Towards Targeted Unlearning from a Causal Intervention Perspective24 Jul
  3. 2024Learning to Refuse: Towards Mitigating Privacy Risks in LLMs14 Jul
  4. 2024Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning19 Jun
  5. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  6. 2024Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMs26 Feb
  7. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  8. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
  9. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct

Other references · 9

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  7. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
  8. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
  9. 2023Privacy Issues in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 57

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 9.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: