Towards identifying possible fault-tolerant advantage of quantum linear system algorithms in terms of space, time and energy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum computing, a prominent non-Von Neumann paradigm beyond Moore's law, can offer superpolynomial speedups for certain problems. Yet its advantages in efficiency for tasks like machine learning remain under investigation, and quantum noise complicates resource estimations and classical comparisons. We provide a detailed estimation of space, time, and energy resources for fault-tolerant superconducting devices running the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm, a quantum linear system solver relevant to linear algebra and machine learning. Excluding memory and data transfer, possible quantum advantages over the classical conjugate gradient method could emerge at N ≈ 233 ~ 248 or even lower, requiring O(105) physical qubits, O(1012~1013) Joules, and O(106) seconds under surface code fault-tolerance with three types of magic state distillation (15-1, 116-12, 225-1). Key parameters include condition number, sparsity, and precision kappa, s≈O(10~100), ε~0.01, and physical error 10-5. Our resource estimator adjusts N, kappa, s, ε, providing a map of quantum-classical boundaries and revealing where a practical quantum advantage may arise. Our work quantitatively determine how advanced a fault-tolerant quantum computer should be to achieve possible, significant benefits on problems related to real-world.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2025.
Builds on
7 of 47 references.
References · 7
- 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 229
- 2023Towards provably efficient quantum algorithms for large-scale machine-learning modelscited by 32
- 2018Quantum linear systems algorithms: a primercited by 13
- 2024Quantum linear system algorithm with optimal queries to initial state preparationcited by 3
- 2023Randomized adiabatic quantum linear solver algorithm with optimal complexity scaling and detailed running costscited by 2
- 2023Fundamental causal bounds of quantum random access memoriescited by 2
- 2023Simulation-Based Evaluation of Energy-Constrained Quantum-Classical Competitioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.